England riots – What’s all this then, eh?

Letters from O'Brien #63

Dear Mr Smith,

I must write a short letter addressing the current ‘UK riots’ which, understandably, are making all the headlines. I think they are being used for dialectical purposes, and these purposes will be exploited in coming months.

These protests appear to have begun following the Leeds riots last month, in which Pakistani and other foreign immigrants began burning down parts of the town, with practically no police response. However, the current ‘riots’, as you would be aware, began following the recent stabbing and killing of three children by an immigrant. After the stabbing a vigil was held, which remained peaceful until it was revealed that a second African immigrant had been apprehended up the road from the event, who had been preparing to attack vigil-goers with a melee weapon.

This appears to have caused the crowd to go from peaceful vigil to full blown protest. However, note that this was - given the context - very limited in scope. Over the following days, other ‘justifications’ were given for white Britons to go out and protest immigration. Fair enough. However, it could be construed somewhat curious that these protests quickly turned frantic after they were shared around online – there being prominent conservative accounts, out in force, encouraging these riots. Obviously one of the justifications is that the British people have ‘had enough’ of the police doing nothing, and that it’s time for the people to take matters into their ‘own hands’. This is what many of these accounts on Twitter are saying to encourage further rioting.

Take a closer look and one will find that many of these ‘conservatives’ are pro-Zio accounts - like Tommy Robinson. Not only that, but they are framing this not as a ‘white British’ against ‘foreign immigrants’ issue, but (as Robinson put it) a Hamas issue. Really? How is it a Hamas issue?

Now I might be completely conspiratorial and cynical in my outlook, but it seems to me that normal, everyday, fed-up Englishmen and women are being manipulated to take part in a planned and orchestrated event. Emotion is the driving factor here, but then again it almost always is, and only after the moment has passed can people look back with some clarity.

I must first say, however, that the general sentiment that is emerging from this recent event is welcome (i.e. ‘we can’t live in such precarious circumstances any longer)’, but it must be sustained in such a way as to actually result in change. Working class people must awaken to the fact that they are the target of an ethnic attack.

GOALS OF THE PROTESTS

I think you could draw some parallels with the J6 event in the States. It is aimed at sweeping up the white Britons - the target of the regime - into a frenzy, and using this to justify increased police presence, censorship, and ultimately the imprisonment or legal scrutiny of those who attended these protests. Both Labour and the Tories have been longing for such an event like this for years, and now here it is. If this continues to blow up, and poor decisions are made by protestors (as we’ve seen), it could be catastrophic. Smashing windows at an immigrant hotel will not result in change; it should be clear by now that ‘public opinion’ changes nothing, and that all institutions in England have been seized by foreign and hostile entities. This is crucial to remember, because institutional capture is what sets apart immigrant rioters being bailed out from nationalists going to jail for doing a fraction of the damage.

Secondly, I don’t think it is by chance that many of the ‘conservative’ pro-Zionist accounts are out in force pushing for this. The framing of this as a Muslim-vs-‘British’ issue is ridiculous, because it obfuscates from a few key problems; firstly, many immigrants from Africa and India are Hindu, Sikh, and so on. Secondly, the fundamental issue is that this is not a purely religious issue, it is clearly a racial issue, with ethnic white British people being the target of replacement. These conservative pro-Zionists - make no mistake - are linked in some form or another with the likes of Starmer (who, by the way, recently revealed he ‘observes Shabbat’).

The goal here seems to be justification for increased censorship (as the Labour Party has openly advocated for years) and secondly increase public hostility towards ‘Muslims’ and thus reverse sentiment to sit in favour of a war with Iran. People talk about past psyops and wonder how we ever got fooled, but this is the same trick and tactic used to shift rhetoric before the Invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Think logically about this; they will never deport these immigrants. The leftist Starmer government never will, and the Zionists never will. These pro-Zio conservatives are all in favour of ‘multicultural meritocracy’. That is to say, they don’t care about native Britons, nor do they care about mass migration, so long as the migrants ‘have merit’. Tommy Robinson believes that legal immigration from the third world is perfectly ok.

The harsh reality is this; mid-level rioting will do nothing except land people in prison. ‘Voicing discontent’ does nothing to sway a government who probably want you dead anyway. Immigration will not stop. The government will not stop. The most passionate Brits will all be in jail.

If the governmental institutions are as corrupted as we are led to believe, then realistically (and what we know historically) a full-blown nationwide uproar resulting in military and law enforcement siding with the people and seizing parliamentary power, will, obviously, effect change. This technically could happen if discontent outweighs convenience and comfort in the eyes of everyday Englishmen. Will it happen? Who knows. There’d be a hell of a price to pay for such a coup. I have a feeling that if things do grow to a nationwide level, that a hypothetical ‘final option’ by the government would be to black out social media completely, thus limiting oppositional organisation.

Infiltrating the institutions of power and using entryism to bring in likeminded individuals is the key. The reverse of the ‘long march through the institutions’ by the powers that be. As far as I can see, there’s no international finance-backed revolution (as with the Bolsheviks) coming to England, there’s no military takeover (like in Pol Pot’s Cambodia), and there’s no standout speaker (as in 1930s Germany) rising up to ‘lead the revolution’. Unless the people somehow seize parliamentary power directly, one of the only other options is institutional seizure through capture.

If the sentiment emerging amongst working class people is coherent, consistent, and unaffected by attempts to distract or manipulate, then the counter-immigration movement will have a chance. If native Britons realise they are being fundamentally targeted for racial erasure, and they keep a level head, they can be strategic as well as passionate. This is not about religion. The man that stabbed those three girls was neither an ‘immigrant’ (he was a UK citizen) nor was he Muslim. The working class must see the situation for what it truly is; demographic replacement, using whatever third world population is available.

Now I may be completely wrong about all this. Happy for this letter to be condemned as the ravings of a mad man who’s seen too many conspiracies of late. Nevertheless, I think the English people have a justified anger towards immigration and the destruction of their country, but there are some seeking to redirect this anger to achieve nefarious ends (or obfuscate from deeper truths, or both). The English need to be smart, not be swayed by momentary emotions, stay locked in on the long-term goal of seizing institutional control to take back their country. With resolve and momentum (and good leadership) this would be possible without setting anything on fire.