Olympic false flags and war with Iran?

Letters from O'Brien #61

Dear Mr Smith,

Predictably, the opening ceremony of the Paris Olympics overflowed with the usual end-of-days symbolism - the pale horse, the three children being carried by Charon across the river Styx into the afterlife, the ode to Sodom and Gomorrah, the entire ceremony had the overtones of apostasy & destruction. Predictive programming? Or is it the powers that be can’t help but boast about the current state of affairs?

This year the artistic director for the opening and closing ceremonies for the games was Thomas Jolly - a Jewish actor and director living in France, who supposedly is a Zionist. Now usually I am not interested in these events, but this one is worth noting. Why? Consider the connections. The theme seems to be war and destruction, at a time when we are looking for the flashpoint, or at least an escalation, for war with Iran.

I think at the moment, of all possible global conflicts, the one most likely to ‘spontaneously occur’ is a war between the west and Iran. The media has attempted to normalise this narrative for years, but it is anything but normal. It is artificial. The reason why Iran is in the crosshairs is the same reason why Syria, Iraq, and Libya have all been targeted in the past; they are regional threats to the establishment of ‘Greater Israel’.

Thus far the Biden administration has attempted to restrict the possibility of regional war breaking out in the Middle East. This is positive stance, avoiding World War 3, ironically, out of a misplaced sense of liberal anti-colonial rhetoric. If US military support began to flow freely again to Israel, the most likely scenario would be a preeminent strike by Israel against Lebanon. The likelihood of this happening is almost guaranteed; the IDF has told Hezbollah that if they do not pull their troops north of the Litani River, then the IDF will intervene militarily in Lebanon. Strategically speaking, Hezbollah is unlikely to do this, as they know it means a buffer zone which places Israel - with their air assets and tanks - at a clear advantage. To Hezbollah it is probable that they view such a deal as guaranteeing Israel the southern parts of Lebanon.

Beyond Lebanon, the next target would be Iran. Israel cannot take on Iran alone, let alone Iran and Hezbollah. This is why Hezbollah would be targeted first. They have massive quantities of missiles which could overwhelm the Iron Dome. Thus, it is almost certainly the case that Israel would rely on America and the west to knock out Iran. Such a conflict would almost certainly require more troops and come at a greater cost of life than the Iraq War. It is likely that Iran would employ more powerful digital, chemical, and potentially nuclear weapons. It would end in permanent regime change in Iran. Worst of all; it would all be a needless, pointless war, fought for nothing against a nation which cannot threaten America.

These reasons are why there is the potential for false flags occurring during the Olympic games. Within the first 24 hours, one can already see the first fruits of such an operation; what was reported as an ‘arson attack’ occurred in the Paris metro, shutting down the railways before the opening ceremony. Yet despite a lack of evidence, Israeli foreign minister Israel Katz reported soon after the attack that it was “planned and executed under the influence of Iran’s axis of evil”. Even the Times of Israel note that Katz had zero evidence for this, and the statements convenient timing points to ulterior motives for pushing such a narrative.

One must ask the obvious question; why would Iran do this? The answer should be equally obvious; they wouldn’t. Iran would not benefit in any way from such an attack. Not only would it be an act of aggression against a random western nation (France), but given the context, it would clearly be perceived as an international attack. But that’s exactly the point; if an attack - a serious attack - were to occur at the Olympic Games, it would provoke a very serious response.

For this reason, I believe it is possible that a false flag event will occur with the explicit goal of forcing public opinion to shift against Iran and in favour of intervention. People seem to be talking about all sorts of potential events or happenings at the games, but it is clear that those with the money and the ideological incentive are currently invested in one thing: removing Iran as a regional threat to Israel.

Such an event - whether at the Olympic Games or in the near future - will be sold to the American people as ‘an attack against western democracy’. It will be sold to the Israeli population as ‘an existential security threat’. Yet the goal is not merely ‘regional security’, it is to expand the borders of Israel to embrace ‘Greater Israel’. This grand vision for the region is in accordance with religious elites and zealots, who believe that all land from the Mediterranean to the Euphrates River in southwest Iraq belongs to Israel. Some believe that gaining control of these regions is necessary to usher in the Jewish Messiah, who will be the ultimate warrior-leader that defeats ‘Israel’s enemies’.

An escalation of hostilities would also justify the continued use of emergency powers by the Likud party in Israel. Without a cease in the conflict, elections are unlikely to take place. If an election were to take place, it is possible that Likud would lose power.

Given what has been revealed since the beginning of the conflict, there is a lot at stake for the reputation of Netanyahu and his party; firstly, it was finally admitted recently that Israeli intelligence was aware of the Hamas attack plans up to 1 year in advance. Secondly, they withheld information during the time of the attack, allowing maximum chaos. Helicopter pilots and troops were then given orders to fire on ‘Hamas fighters’ in houses and in rows of cars. As it turned out, these were mostly civilians, and some soldiers report a ‘Hannibal Directive’ order coming down the command chain. This led to the death of hundreds of civilians. Thirdly, Hamas has already offered to release all hostages if Netanyahu pulls his troops back; an option which would have obviously been taken if Netanyahu’s rhetoric about saving the hostages matched the party’s ambition.

In his recent address to Congress, Netanyahu made it clear that he is committed to the current narrative. In fact, during the strange speech Bibi repeated several verifiably false claims. The most prominent was the ’40 beheaded babies’ claim, which was disproven not only by Israeli media but also by the reporter who had originally made the claim. He talked about hostages, but ignored the fact that hundreds of civilians were killed - supposedly by the deliberate Hannibal directive - in an IDF response. Clearly his party doesn’t care about the truth of these things; the attack was most likely allowed to happen to justify a response, and that response would be used to force the US military into taking out Iran directly and allowing for the expansion of the Israeli borders. That sounds extreme – but we are in extreme days!

Such a war with Iran - which would force an American response one way or another - would be catastrophic. Afghanistan and Iraq were both costly, but despite occurring only 20 years ago, the America that engaged in those conflicts basically doesn’t exist anymore. If a war were to occur in Iran, we should hope that it is only as costly as the Iraq war. As some on Twitter have been echoing recently, a war with Iran would be Americas equivalent of the Soviet-Afghan war; the final battle before total economic implosion.

China, Russia, and India are all growing in geopolitics strength. Russia surprised many as it saw victories in Africa against other European proxies, essentially resetting influence in the west African region. China’s influence grows in Asia and South America. India is advocating for an ‘International nationalism’ in which the Indian diaspora advances Indian interests abroad. This is all to say, we are in a new Cold War, and America is spiritually, socially, and economically sick.

Interestingly, Russia is the only ‘adversarial’ power that shares a lot of common values and Christian history. All others are profoundly atheistic or culturally estranged from the average European. This is why I believe it is important to focus on reforming America into a Christian nation, rather than allowing it to crumble in another ridiculous middle eastern war. Of course, the current cohort of atheistic westerners are repulsed by the idea that a stable and prosperous nation should be built on Christian values, but history shows that’s been a good way to go.

I think what we should pay attention to is the framing. Everything is already in motion. The media has begun pushing the idea of Iran being an existential threat and reports constantly circulate about Iranian proxies operating in the West. This always happens right before an event, so that previous claims can be used to add a layer of legitimacy in manufacturing consent. Interesting and rather unnerving days we are in.

Sincerely yours,

O’Brien