22 Comments
Jun 11, 2022·edited Jun 11, 2022Liked by Winston Smith

Capitalism, socialism, democracy, anarchy, communism, tyranny, dictatorship, they were all experimented on the global populace, and all of them failed eventually, because there will always be those monkeys who want all the bananas.

Tiananmen has been China's moment to break the shackles, and they failed even before growing into a proper revolution. They would have failed anyway like all other revolutions, hijacked by power hungry factions within leading them straight into the next tyranny.

People may think that there is power and safety in numbers, while the reality is exactly the opposite. The real power is in small groups with similar objectives, not in a large mass behaving like dumb livestock.

There are a few issues wit this gradual boiling we are exposed to.

People are still being afraid of losing what they will lose anyway if they continue to cower behind petitions, justice, dignity, truth, human rights, peaceful demonstrations, religious beliefs, all those principles which are now DEAD.

If they eat, they will die of glyphosate sprayed on everything, and all the other chemicals injected into the livestock. Everything they try to raise in their own backyard will be destroyed by your trusty and caring "selected ones", so they may start foraging, but whatever they will find is already poisoned by chemical dumps and fallout from chemtrails.

Drinking water will keep them hydrated, but won't do them much good either.

They spend all their already limited time slaving for their owners, and raising children for their oppressors' sexually depraved pleasures.

When they have had enough of being alive, they can pay a visit to their doctor and they will soon be on their way to meet their maker.

But the thought of killing their killers still frightens them, so perhaps it is their time to die, for weaklings always end up on the dining table.

Everyone suffers by choice, and that choice is to blame everyone else for their own failures, and wait for a mighty saviour which does not exist, like the unfortunate Americans.

Trump is not their saviour. He's their final demise. America does not have politicians, but organised crime syndicates playing the gullible public left-right-left-right in a game so obvious it would be laughable if the amount of power and influence involved would not affect the whole world, where the same ping-pong game is being played since the dawn of mankind...

It is not about overcrowding, pollution, climate, resources.

CO2 is vital for plant life and it is at an all time minimum, the climate is mostly influenced by the Sun and outer space environment, the resources are renewing at a much faster pace than we can consume, and the entire human population living now on this planet could be housed in Texas, with plenty of room to spare.

We are under attack by monsters who are addicted to killing, and unless we respond accordingly, this is the end. That's all.

Expand full comment
Jun 11, 2022Liked by Winston Smith

This is the history that needs to be learned in schools. But since many schools have become indoctrination factories, the home is where our future liberties will be born, grown and nurtured.

The western sinophile narrative was strong even back then. The delusion that the CCP was building a democracy for the betterment of humanity was a warning of the top down narratives to come, which we are living in today.

As history fades, I'm curious if there are reliable sources, in physical print, that fully explain what happened.

As the masses teeter-totter from their required EastAsian to Eurasian two minutes hate, we must preserve the realities of history, or forever be stuck in a fictional feedback loop.

Expand full comment

O'Brien's letter expresses much the same views on China as the neo-con faction of Republicans. I came to Substack to try to escape such disinformation. Larry Romanoff, not a Jew, not a radical leftist, writes about China frequently at Unz.com a site which has some great dissident right-wing writers as well as a token leftist presence. https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/some-things-you-should-maybe-know-about-china/

Expand full comment
Jun 11, 2022·edited Jun 11, 2022Liked by Winston Smith

I remember that day clearly. I was a young adult in Marin Co and it shocked my core.

With disbelief I've witnessed the USA overthrown by a rogue government whose intent is to destroy our Constitution,

our Birth Rights

and our Moral Compass.

Instead of ccp tanks crushing students in the streets, I've witnessed dark money funded medical establishment accept bribes for bioweapons;

color revolution attempt to disarm our citizens while arming agitators (antifa, nazis, f bee i); shutter and destroy our businesses; and imprison and murder our peaceful citizens.

Patriots are fighting a hybrid war,

and Winning. I have faith and hope in these perilous times.

Fight, fight, fight.

Pushing back when my Constitutional Rights are threatened.

Expand full comment

Yes, history needs to be learned and one of those lessons was that there was no massacre.

Jay Mathews was there Beijing Washington Bureau Chief and covered the event. Here’s his article still on the Colombia journalism review entitled «The Myth of Tiananmen» https://archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php

𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴: 𝘢𝘴 𝘧𝘢𝘳 𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘣𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘷𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦, 𝘯𝘰 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘯𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘛𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘚𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘦.

𝘈 𝘧𝘦𝘸 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘬𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘮 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘯 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘵𝘴 𝘯𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘦, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘦𝘺𝘦𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘴𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘰𝘱𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘧𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘺. 𝘏𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦, 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘣𝘺, 𝘥𝘪𝘥 𝘥𝘪𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘯𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘤𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘶𝘮𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴.

Ron Unz commentary who I see has been mentioned.

𝘈𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘔𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘸𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘢𝘮𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘤𝘳𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘥, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘢 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘞𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘢, 𝘢 𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘯 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘭𝘺 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘥𝘥𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦, 𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘭𝘺 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘴𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘫𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘦. 𝘐𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘥, 𝘢𝘴 𝘯𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘭𝘦𝘧𝘵 𝘛𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘚𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘧𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘺, 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘊𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥. 𝘐𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘦𝘥, 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘯𝘦𝘸𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘕𝘦𝘸 𝘠𝘰𝘳𝘬 𝘛𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘢𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘵𝘰𝘯 𝘗𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘰𝘤𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘢𝘤𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸𝘭𝘦𝘥𝘨𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘶𝘴𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘣𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘺 𝘢𝘥𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘴𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘦𝘱 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘧𝘦𝘸 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘦𝘥. 𝘔𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘦, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘶𝘭𝘬 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘧𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘯 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘩𝘰𝘢𝘹.

𝘔𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘸𝘴 𝘩𝘪𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘉𝘦𝘪𝘫𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘉𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘶 𝘊𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘧 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘢𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘵𝘰𝘯 𝘗𝘰𝘴𝘵, 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘤𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘊𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘮𝘣𝘪𝘢 𝘑𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘙𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘦𝘸, 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘶𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘮. 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘶𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘺𝘴𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘱𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 1998, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘐 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘰𝘳 𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘊𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘺𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘢𝘣𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘯𝘪𝘭. 𝘍𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘸𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘺 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘷𝘪𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵 𝘐 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘰𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘛𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘚𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘔𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘤𝘳𝘦 𝘏𝘰𝘢𝘹, 𝘶𝘴𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘭𝘺.

https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-our-coronavirus-catastrophe-as-biowarfare-blowback/

Expand full comment