Capitalism, socialism, democracy, anarchy, communism, tyranny, dictatorship, they were all experimented on the global populace, and all of them failed eventually, because there will always be those monkeys who want all the bananas.
Tiananmen has been China's moment to break the shackles, and they failed even before growing into a proper revolution. They would have failed anyway like all other revolutions, hijacked by power hungry factions within leading them straight into the next tyranny.
People may think that there is power and safety in numbers, while the reality is exactly the opposite. The real power is in small groups with similar objectives, not in a large mass behaving like dumb livestock.
There are a few issues wit this gradual boiling we are exposed to.
People are still being afraid of losing what they will lose anyway if they continue to cower behind petitions, justice, dignity, truth, human rights, peaceful demonstrations, religious beliefs, all those principles which are now DEAD.
If they eat, they will die of glyphosate sprayed on everything, and all the other chemicals injected into the livestock. Everything they try to raise in their own backyard will be destroyed by your trusty and caring "selected ones", so they may start foraging, but whatever they will find is already poisoned by chemical dumps and fallout from chemtrails.
Drinking water will keep them hydrated, but won't do them much good either.
They spend all their already limited time slaving for their owners, and raising children for their oppressors' sexually depraved pleasures.
When they have had enough of being alive, they can pay a visit to their doctor and they will soon be on their way to meet their maker.
But the thought of killing their killers still frightens them, so perhaps it is their time to die, for weaklings always end up on the dining table.
Everyone suffers by choice, and that choice is to blame everyone else for their own failures, and wait for a mighty saviour which does not exist, like the unfortunate Americans.
Trump is not their saviour. He's their final demise. America does not have politicians, but organised crime syndicates playing the gullible public left-right-left-right in a game so obvious it would be laughable if the amount of power and influence involved would not affect the whole world, where the same ping-pong game is being played since the dawn of mankind...
It is not about overcrowding, pollution, climate, resources.
CO2 is vital for plant life and it is at an all time minimum, the climate is mostly influenced by the Sun and outer space environment, the resources are renewing at a much faster pace than we can consume, and the entire human population living now on this planet could be housed in Texas, with plenty of room to spare.
We are under attack by monsters who are addicted to killing, and unless we respond accordingly, this is the end. That's all.
So I take it that the answer is "small groups with similar objectives" responding in kind to the monsters? How exactly is that done when the monsters hold all the cards, as you so chillingly describe?
Ahahaaa, they hold all the cards, but why ? Because our parents did nothing, and their parents did nothing, apart from small chats around the diner table about some overheard "conspiracy theories".
And now, we do the same thing, but online. That's why. While allowing them to rig the system and to keep it rigged. 30-40-50 years in politics, and we expect these people to be honest, to not have built secret networks of dubious interests, and to share the cookie jars ?
Ha, ha, ha...
With all their technologies, what really keeps them powerful is the small people who know how to operate these devices, and the ones shielding them from us - army and police.
Without these shields, all that is left is a small gang of old and frail psychos, terrified that soon the grim reaper will steal their fake money from them.
They rely on wireless, we can use jammers, plenty of all sorts available. Or we can find the key communication nodes and blow them up. I know one in London. I flipped the general switch once, and all their comms went dead, all the police cars, the choppers lost their bearings, surveillance cameras, bang, dead. In 4 minutes, the parking lot was full of unmarked CID cars, it was great fun. And no back up kicked in. Cell towers are easy targets as well. Wired networks can be broken and isolated too, there are maps available online, if one knows where and how to search.
Technologies, does not matter how reliable for them and frightening to us may seem, have many Achille's heels, the major one is they don't work without a constant supply of mains electricity, many Amps of it, more than batteries or solar cells can supply.
Why do you think they are imposing the "green tech" on us, internal combustion engines cannot be switched off remotely, bypassing the comm module in the newer ones will solve that easily. But electric cars need recharging wherever they run dry on current, bypass that if you can.
Small groups.
A small group of people is not conspicuous, and getting a snitch into one is difficult. All they need to do is gather reliable info, pick a target, finish it and disband, while other groups do the same in parallel, on their own targets, with no connexion between them. Everyone needs to get creative, instead of waiting for ideas and orders from some general saviour who's nowhere in sight.
Of course there are risks involved, major risks to one's health, freedom, life, but the only alternative is losing the same health, freedom and life, for certain. We don't have much choice here.
I really need to go, there is so much to write on these subjects...
This is the history that needs to be learned in schools. But since many schools have become indoctrination factories, the home is where our future liberties will be born, grown and nurtured.
The western sinophile narrative was strong even back then. The delusion that the CCP was building a democracy for the betterment of humanity was a warning of the top down narratives to come, which we are living in today.
As history fades, I'm curious if there are reliable sources, in physical print, that fully explain what happened.
As the masses teeter-totter from their required EastAsian to Eurasian two minutes hate, we must preserve the realities of history, or forever be stuck in a fictional feedback loop.
'tis true that the learning of history is a sizeable key - this is why it's important to re-articulate it as accurately as we are able - even if we think, "hey, everyone knows about that!" you'd be surprised.
O'Brien's letter expresses much the same views on China as the neo-con faction of Republicans. I came to Substack to try to escape such disinformation. Larry Romanoff, not a Jew, not a radical leftist, writes about China frequently at Unz.com a site which has some great dissident right-wing writers as well as a token leftist presence. https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/some-things-you-should-maybe-know-about-china/
I too have some rather negative thoughts about European Khazarian Jews which I've not expressed yet - will look more into this unz.com. O'Brien gave me two pieces on China - a negative one and a more positive one - I've posted this negative one first, will be interesting to see what reaction the other one gets.
By all means post the other piece and allow yourself to speak to the JQ. You might also speak to the neo-con issue as it affects trad/paleo conservatives.
A word of caution about the Kazarian Mafia which has popped up among the neo-con, gate-keeping pundits and vloggers: it's a diversion, a smokescreen, as if Judaism has been taken captive by the racist, white supremacist Khazars. If you've read, say Deuteronomy, you'll realize the religion was supremacist from the beginning. Yahweh encourages, nay demands, slaughter of enemies for which he will award them w/ the booty of the nations.
I read with some interest at first as I love Ron Unz site but holy hell that guy is dishonest at best.
He wrote nothing about the lockdowns in Shanghai, and wrote an article about how Sweden had failed, emphasizing a graphic comparing them ONLY to Denmark and Norway.
Don't think he's on the payroll but he has done a lot of business in China. He's obviously partisan to them. Would you apply the same bias accusation to anti-Chinese writers?
I have a friend, a Qtard who bashes China all the time. He thinks they'll be attacking us from north, south and east soon enough. Can't stop whingeing about the abuses against the Qyghurs, when if they were in the US he'd want them deported because they're jihadist Muslims. This is irrational thinking: his emotional cage has been rattled by neo-cons.
You don't have to love China, but there's little reason to hate them either.
I've no experience in China but have had experience with Chinese students in my classes - some bold ones would, in unguarded moments, basically let me know that they are the superior race and will soon rule the world. You could put some of that down to youthful zeal but they are mostly measured and careful and such sentiment comes across as a deeply held belief - not arrogance from their perspective, just the truth.
I don't love China, but I don't hate them either, I am, however, very concerned as to how they are strategically positioning themselves in the South Pacific. That might not mean anything to you in America. Time will tell if my concerns were justified or not. I'm certainly not going to apologise for being concerned.
The vast majority of my concern, however, is the debased, immoral, schizophrenic, psychopathic Western powers.
I guess that means you're in Australia. Being a minion of the US is going to hurt you more than it helps. China's not coming after you unless you guys do something stupid.
We do stupid things all the time - it's just your myopic US-centric news outlets don't cover much of what's happening out here on the fringe. China will, and is, and has, come after us for our resources - just not with guns and tanks... not yet... hopefully never... they will probably just continue to buy us out.
Some of his stuff is over the top. I don't buy it all either. But he makes many valid points about China that the current rabid wave of criticism ignores. Don't throw the baby out w/ the bathwater. Ron Unz didn't. Maybe look at more of his writings on different subjects. You'll see he's not a clown.
How is it that conservatives and liberals can agree China is an enemy to fear when they can't agree on anything else? What's the motive for the Right bashing China? Communism? We've got our own communists to fight in the West and their agenda is to distract and destroy us. Replace the White race in our homelands. China like Russia wants her empire. But they have no territorial or racial designs on us.
For me the motive to stir up the American people against China that is Judaism's lack of financial influence over China and that is unsettling to the Chosen. It's the same reason Libya was destroyed and Iran is on their list. They will deploy their vassals to fight against any powers that resist their hegemony.
I was a bit harsh, but the gaslighting about stupid19 rubs me poorly…I was really really hoping he would give some insight on the Shanghai lockdowns and why they were just misunderstood by us westerners, but really all his fawning about mutual respect and admiration And humility goes out the window if you don’t explain that.
I liked the perspective but like you said it wasn’t anything except bias from the other side. The Sweden story means he’s on the patrol or he’s just a f👑 idiot.
I remember that day clearly. I was a young adult in Marin Co and it shocked my core.
With disbelief I've witnessed the USA overthrown by a rogue government whose intent is to destroy our Constitution,
our Birth Rights
and our Moral Compass.
Instead of ccp tanks crushing students in the streets, I've witnessed dark money funded medical establishment accept bribes for bioweapons;
color revolution attempt to disarm our citizens while arming agitators (antifa, nazis, f bee i); shutter and destroy our businesses; and imprison and murder our peaceful citizens.
Patriots are fighting a hybrid war,
and Winning. I have faith and hope in these perilous times.
Fight, fight, fight.
Pushing back when my Constitutional Rights are threatened.
☕
Capitalism, socialism, democracy, anarchy, communism, tyranny, dictatorship, they were all experimented on the global populace, and all of them failed eventually, because there will always be those monkeys who want all the bananas.
Tiananmen has been China's moment to break the shackles, and they failed even before growing into a proper revolution. They would have failed anyway like all other revolutions, hijacked by power hungry factions within leading them straight into the next tyranny.
People may think that there is power and safety in numbers, while the reality is exactly the opposite. The real power is in small groups with similar objectives, not in a large mass behaving like dumb livestock.
There are a few issues wit this gradual boiling we are exposed to.
People are still being afraid of losing what they will lose anyway if they continue to cower behind petitions, justice, dignity, truth, human rights, peaceful demonstrations, religious beliefs, all those principles which are now DEAD.
If they eat, they will die of glyphosate sprayed on everything, and all the other chemicals injected into the livestock. Everything they try to raise in their own backyard will be destroyed by your trusty and caring "selected ones", so they may start foraging, but whatever they will find is already poisoned by chemical dumps and fallout from chemtrails.
Drinking water will keep them hydrated, but won't do them much good either.
They spend all their already limited time slaving for their owners, and raising children for their oppressors' sexually depraved pleasures.
When they have had enough of being alive, they can pay a visit to their doctor and they will soon be on their way to meet their maker.
But the thought of killing their killers still frightens them, so perhaps it is their time to die, for weaklings always end up on the dining table.
Everyone suffers by choice, and that choice is to blame everyone else for their own failures, and wait for a mighty saviour which does not exist, like the unfortunate Americans.
Trump is not their saviour. He's their final demise. America does not have politicians, but organised crime syndicates playing the gullible public left-right-left-right in a game so obvious it would be laughable if the amount of power and influence involved would not affect the whole world, where the same ping-pong game is being played since the dawn of mankind...
It is not about overcrowding, pollution, climate, resources.
CO2 is vital for plant life and it is at an all time minimum, the climate is mostly influenced by the Sun and outer space environment, the resources are renewing at a much faster pace than we can consume, and the entire human population living now on this planet could be housed in Texas, with plenty of room to spare.
We are under attack by monsters who are addicted to killing, and unless we respond accordingly, this is the end. That's all.
So I take it that the answer is "small groups with similar objectives" responding in kind to the monsters? How exactly is that done when the monsters hold all the cards, as you so chillingly describe?
ツ
Ahahaaa, they hold all the cards, but why ? Because our parents did nothing, and their parents did nothing, apart from small chats around the diner table about some overheard "conspiracy theories".
And now, we do the same thing, but online. That's why. While allowing them to rig the system and to keep it rigged. 30-40-50 years in politics, and we expect these people to be honest, to not have built secret networks of dubious interests, and to share the cookie jars ?
Ha, ha, ha...
With all their technologies, what really keeps them powerful is the small people who know how to operate these devices, and the ones shielding them from us - army and police.
Without these shields, all that is left is a small gang of old and frail psychos, terrified that soon the grim reaper will steal their fake money from them.
They rely on wireless, we can use jammers, plenty of all sorts available. Or we can find the key communication nodes and blow them up. I know one in London. I flipped the general switch once, and all their comms went dead, all the police cars, the choppers lost their bearings, surveillance cameras, bang, dead. In 4 minutes, the parking lot was full of unmarked CID cars, it was great fun. And no back up kicked in. Cell towers are easy targets as well. Wired networks can be broken and isolated too, there are maps available online, if one knows where and how to search.
Technologies, does not matter how reliable for them and frightening to us may seem, have many Achille's heels, the major one is they don't work without a constant supply of mains electricity, many Amps of it, more than batteries or solar cells can supply.
Why do you think they are imposing the "green tech" on us, internal combustion engines cannot be switched off remotely, bypassing the comm module in the newer ones will solve that easily. But electric cars need recharging wherever they run dry on current, bypass that if you can.
Small groups.
A small group of people is not conspicuous, and getting a snitch into one is difficult. All they need to do is gather reliable info, pick a target, finish it and disband, while other groups do the same in parallel, on their own targets, with no connexion between them. Everyone needs to get creative, instead of waiting for ideas and orders from some general saviour who's nowhere in sight.
Of course there are risks involved, major risks to one's health, freedom, life, but the only alternative is losing the same health, freedom and life, for certain. We don't have much choice here.
I really need to go, there is so much to write on these subjects...
Maybe later. All the best.
This is the history that needs to be learned in schools. But since many schools have become indoctrination factories, the home is where our future liberties will be born, grown and nurtured.
The western sinophile narrative was strong even back then. The delusion that the CCP was building a democracy for the betterment of humanity was a warning of the top down narratives to come, which we are living in today.
As history fades, I'm curious if there are reliable sources, in physical print, that fully explain what happened.
As the masses teeter-totter from their required EastAsian to Eurasian two minutes hate, we must preserve the realities of history, or forever be stuck in a fictional feedback loop.
'tis true that the learning of history is a sizeable key - this is why it's important to re-articulate it as accurately as we are able - even if we think, "hey, everyone knows about that!" you'd be surprised.
O'Brien's letter expresses much the same views on China as the neo-con faction of Republicans. I came to Substack to try to escape such disinformation. Larry Romanoff, not a Jew, not a radical leftist, writes about China frequently at Unz.com a site which has some great dissident right-wing writers as well as a token leftist presence. https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/some-things-you-should-maybe-know-about-china/
TY for this link.
The masked (controlled, silenced and suffocated) citizens is worth a thousand words.
I too have some rather negative thoughts about European Khazarian Jews which I've not expressed yet - will look more into this unz.com. O'Brien gave me two pieces on China - a negative one and a more positive one - I've posted this negative one first, will be interesting to see what reaction the other one gets.
By all means post the other piece and allow yourself to speak to the JQ. You might also speak to the neo-con issue as it affects trad/paleo conservatives.
A word of caution about the Kazarian Mafia which has popped up among the neo-con, gate-keeping pundits and vloggers: it's a diversion, a smokescreen, as if Judaism has been taken captive by the racist, white supremacist Khazars. If you've read, say Deuteronomy, you'll realize the religion was supremacist from the beginning. Yahweh encourages, nay demands, slaughter of enemies for which he will award them w/ the booty of the nations.
I read with some interest at first as I love Ron Unz site but holy hell that guy is dishonest at best.
He wrote nothing about the lockdowns in Shanghai, and wrote an article about how Sweden had failed, emphasizing a graphic comparing them ONLY to Denmark and Norway.
Sorry, that guy is a clown.
I've had a bit of a read myself - seems extremely biased - on the CCP payroll?
Don't think he's on the payroll but he has done a lot of business in China. He's obviously partisan to them. Would you apply the same bias accusation to anti-Chinese writers?
I have a friend, a Qtard who bashes China all the time. He thinks they'll be attacking us from north, south and east soon enough. Can't stop whingeing about the abuses against the Qyghurs, when if they were in the US he'd want them deported because they're jihadist Muslims. This is irrational thinking: his emotional cage has been rattled by neo-cons.
You don't have to love China, but there's little reason to hate them either.
I've no experience in China but have had experience with Chinese students in my classes - some bold ones would, in unguarded moments, basically let me know that they are the superior race and will soon rule the world. You could put some of that down to youthful zeal but they are mostly measured and careful and such sentiment comes across as a deeply held belief - not arrogance from their perspective, just the truth.
I don't love China, but I don't hate them either, I am, however, very concerned as to how they are strategically positioning themselves in the South Pacific. That might not mean anything to you in America. Time will tell if my concerns were justified or not. I'm certainly not going to apologise for being concerned.
The vast majority of my concern, however, is the debased, immoral, schizophrenic, psychopathic Western powers.
I guess that means you're in Australia. Being a minion of the US is going to hurt you more than it helps. China's not coming after you unless you guys do something stupid.
We do stupid things all the time - it's just your myopic US-centric news outlets don't cover much of what's happening out here on the fringe. China will, and is, and has, come after us for our resources - just not with guns and tanks... not yet... hopefully never... they will probably just continue to buy us out.
Some of his stuff is over the top. I don't buy it all either. But he makes many valid points about China that the current rabid wave of criticism ignores. Don't throw the baby out w/ the bathwater. Ron Unz didn't. Maybe look at more of his writings on different subjects. You'll see he's not a clown.
How is it that conservatives and liberals can agree China is an enemy to fear when they can't agree on anything else? What's the motive for the Right bashing China? Communism? We've got our own communists to fight in the West and their agenda is to distract and destroy us. Replace the White race in our homelands. China like Russia wants her empire. But they have no territorial or racial designs on us.
For me the motive to stir up the American people against China that is Judaism's lack of financial influence over China and that is unsettling to the Chosen. It's the same reason Libya was destroyed and Iran is on their list. They will deploy their vassals to fight against any powers that resist their hegemony.
I was a bit harsh, but the gaslighting about stupid19 rubs me poorly…I was really really hoping he would give some insight on the Shanghai lockdowns and why they were just misunderstood by us westerners, but really all his fawning about mutual respect and admiration And humility goes out the window if you don’t explain that.
I liked the perspective but like you said it wasn’t anything except bias from the other side. The Sweden story means he’s on the patrol or he’s just a f👑 idiot.
I'm curious about the Shanghai situation too. You make some valid points. I just ignored his remarks on Sweden.
I remember that day clearly. I was a young adult in Marin Co and it shocked my core.
With disbelief I've witnessed the USA overthrown by a rogue government whose intent is to destroy our Constitution,
our Birth Rights
and our Moral Compass.
Instead of ccp tanks crushing students in the streets, I've witnessed dark money funded medical establishment accept bribes for bioweapons;
color revolution attempt to disarm our citizens while arming agitators (antifa, nazis, f bee i); shutter and destroy our businesses; and imprison and murder our peaceful citizens.
Patriots are fighting a hybrid war,
and Winning. I have faith and hope in these perilous times.
Fight, fight, fight.
Pushing back when my Constitutional Rights are threatened.
Yes, history needs to be learned and one of those lessons was that there was no massacre.
Jay Mathews was there Beijing Washington Bureau Chief and covered the event. Here’s his article still on the Colombia journalism review entitled «The Myth of Tiananmen» https://archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php
𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴: 𝘢𝘴 𝘧𝘢𝘳 𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘣𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘷𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦, 𝘯𝘰 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘯𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘛𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘚𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘦.
𝘈 𝘧𝘦𝘸 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘬𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘮 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘯 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘵𝘴 𝘯𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘦, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘦𝘺𝘦𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘴𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘰𝘱𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘧𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘺. 𝘏𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦, 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘣𝘺, 𝘥𝘪𝘥 𝘥𝘪𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘯𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘤𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘶𝘮𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴.
Ron Unz commentary who I see has been mentioned.
𝘈𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘔𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘸𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘢𝘮𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘤𝘳𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘥, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘢 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘞𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘢, 𝘢 𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘯 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘭𝘺 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘥𝘥𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦, 𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘭𝘺 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘴𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘫𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘦. 𝘐𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘥, 𝘢𝘴 𝘯𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘭𝘦𝘧𝘵 𝘛𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘚𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘧𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘺, 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘊𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥. 𝘐𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘦𝘥, 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘯𝘦𝘸𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘕𝘦𝘸 𝘠𝘰𝘳𝘬 𝘛𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘢𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘵𝘰𝘯 𝘗𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘰𝘤𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘢𝘤𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸𝘭𝘦𝘥𝘨𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘶𝘴𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘣𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘺 𝘢𝘥𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘴𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘦𝘱 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘧𝘦𝘸 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘦𝘥. 𝘔𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘦, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘶𝘭𝘬 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘧𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘯 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘩𝘰𝘢𝘹.
𝘔𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘸𝘴 𝘩𝘪𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘉𝘦𝘪𝘫𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘉𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘶 𝘊𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘧 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘢𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘵𝘰𝘯 𝘗𝘰𝘴𝘵, 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘤𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘊𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘮𝘣𝘪𝘢 𝘑𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘙𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘦𝘸, 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘶𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘮. 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘶𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘺𝘴𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘱𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 1998, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘐 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘰𝘳 𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘊𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘺𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘢𝘣𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘯𝘪𝘭. 𝘍𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘸𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘺 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘷𝘪𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵 𝘐 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘰𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘛𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘚𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘔𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘤𝘳𝘦 𝘏𝘰𝘢𝘹, 𝘶𝘴𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘭𝘺.
https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-our-coronavirus-catastrophe-as-biowarfare-blowback/
I will pass this onto O'Brien