This is all a blatant attack on Christianity folks. They could care less about these confused people looking for answers as to why they despise who they are. They are using these people to push an evil agenda.
Being Victoria, I'm sure there have been - but I haven't done the searching to find out (I honestly wouldn't know how to search for prosecutions based on a particular legislation) - regardless of any successful prosecutions or not, it's just more legal leverage in an attempt to render Christianity (in particular) impotent in society.
The power is in the threatpoint and the codifying of their inverted moral fiat.
There is a blanket indictment effect, an official put-option of malicious prosecution and subsequent burden of defense that would be required to nullify it - all within their system, which is of course the nexus of their power.
This is among the manifold mechanisms utilized to create a near unconscious level of self-censoring and defensive possturing. Here in FUSA, most churches exist economically on the thin topsoil of tax exemption status. There are other such conditions but you get the point.
Further, by the time these things become "laws" or edicts or other official mechanisms of the empire, there is already a dangerous and quite effective source of power that resides beneath.
For example, when you hear your friends school children correct them over appropriate pronouns, other cultmarx vernacular, or outgroup concerns over any of the big lies - and the parents comply, there are already legions of foot soldiers inside the wire in addition to whatever identity of the perpetually aggrieved, mentally deranged, or unfortunates are being weaponized against Truth & Beauty.
Beneath the blatant madness of this Progressive Lawfair lies another, less obvious one. Western Liberalism doesn't know where to draw its social mores lines-in-the-sand.... and sexual dysphorias are an instance. It is right that they should not have been criminalised.....but neither should they be celebrated. This inability to recognise boundaries is our Western tragedy.
As a monogamous, androgynous, homosexual woman (born That way), it is deeply offensive to be compartmentalised in the same box as promiscuous people (regardless of sex or sexual preference). Those who think this is an attack on Christianity are up a gumtree. Go back to the original ideological subversion script; it is about getting youth obsessed with sex and deriding the wisdom of elders. There are no LGBTQI+ 'people' or or an LGBTQI+ 'community'. Homosexual men hate homosexual women because we know what they are and what they have been up to (for decades). Transgendersim was invented by Rothblatt (go and read his 1990's manifesto of make-believe which he submitted to the [captured] UN). The funding has primarily come from Soros 'Open Society' [not] Foundation. And the How to Manual to get the young to submit (pre-prepared) legislation is in the IGLYO Manual - written and provided by Dentons (world's biggest law firm) and Thomson Reuters (world's biggest propaganda factory). It is rent seeking on steroids (literally) - tell govt they need to provide this service and tell govt the only people who are 'qualified' to provide that service are the people that the ideological conversion deviants sanction as being 'qualified'. And, as a Biologist (Scientist), it is equally absurd to insist on putting technology, engineering and maths in the same box as science (STEM).
You have every right to feel deeply offended that you are thrown in the same box as promiscuous people. But this (legislation) is an attack on Christianity (and other religions that have a different moral stance on sexuality). Agreed that the transgenderism movement is being used to undermine society (as we knew it).
This is all a blatant attack on Christianity folks. They could care less about these confused people looking for answers as to why they despise who they are. They are using these people to push an evil agenda.
agreed.
Having been in effect for over two years, one wonders why there have been no prosecutions, or have there?
Being Victoria, I'm sure there have been - but I haven't done the searching to find out (I honestly wouldn't know how to search for prosecutions based on a particular legislation) - regardless of any successful prosecutions or not, it's just more legal leverage in an attempt to render Christianity (in particular) impotent in society.
The power is in the threatpoint and the codifying of their inverted moral fiat.
There is a blanket indictment effect, an official put-option of malicious prosecution and subsequent burden of defense that would be required to nullify it - all within their system, which is of course the nexus of their power.
This is among the manifold mechanisms utilized to create a near unconscious level of self-censoring and defensive possturing. Here in FUSA, most churches exist economically on the thin topsoil of tax exemption status. There are other such conditions but you get the point.
Further, by the time these things become "laws" or edicts or other official mechanisms of the empire, there is already a dangerous and quite effective source of power that resides beneath.
For example, when you hear your friends school children correct them over appropriate pronouns, other cultmarx vernacular, or outgroup concerns over any of the big lies - and the parents comply, there are already legions of foot soldiers inside the wire in addition to whatever identity of the perpetually aggrieved, mentally deranged, or unfortunates are being weaponized against Truth & Beauty.
And the midwits just go along with it thinking they are on the right side. They don't see the deeper play.
They’ve taken over the media and business world. Politics is next ……… if people allow it.
Beneath the blatant madness of this Progressive Lawfair lies another, less obvious one. Western Liberalism doesn't know where to draw its social mores lines-in-the-sand.... and sexual dysphorias are an instance. It is right that they should not have been criminalised.....but neither should they be celebrated. This inability to recognise boundaries is our Western tragedy.
As a monogamous, androgynous, homosexual woman (born That way), it is deeply offensive to be compartmentalised in the same box as promiscuous people (regardless of sex or sexual preference). Those who think this is an attack on Christianity are up a gumtree. Go back to the original ideological subversion script; it is about getting youth obsessed with sex and deriding the wisdom of elders. There are no LGBTQI+ 'people' or or an LGBTQI+ 'community'. Homosexual men hate homosexual women because we know what they are and what they have been up to (for decades). Transgendersim was invented by Rothblatt (go and read his 1990's manifesto of make-believe which he submitted to the [captured] UN). The funding has primarily come from Soros 'Open Society' [not] Foundation. And the How to Manual to get the young to submit (pre-prepared) legislation is in the IGLYO Manual - written and provided by Dentons (world's biggest law firm) and Thomson Reuters (world's biggest propaganda factory). It is rent seeking on steroids (literally) - tell govt they need to provide this service and tell govt the only people who are 'qualified' to provide that service are the people that the ideological conversion deviants sanction as being 'qualified'. And, as a Biologist (Scientist), it is equally absurd to insist on putting technology, engineering and maths in the same box as science (STEM).
You have every right to feel deeply offended that you are thrown in the same box as promiscuous people. But this (legislation) is an attack on Christianity (and other religions that have a different moral stance on sexuality). Agreed that the transgenderism movement is being used to undermine society (as we knew it).