Can we trust any study that the CDC pushes to the front for the big agenda? Here’s a review on a study the CDC were using to demonstrate the safety of mRNA technology on pregnant women.
The use of mRNA vaccines in pregnancy is now generally considered safe for protection against COVID-19 in countries such as New Zealand, USA, and Australia. However, the influential CDC sponsored article by Shimabukuro et al. (2021) used to support this idea, on closer inspection, provides little assurance, particularly for those exposed in early pregnancy. The study presents falsely reassuring statistics related to the risk of spontaneous abortion in early pregnancy, since the majority of women in the calculation were exposed to the mRNA product after the outcome period was defined (20 weeks’ gestation). In this article, we draw attention to these errors and recalculate the risk of this outcome based on the cohort that was exposed to the vaccine before 20 weeks’ gestation. Our re-analysis indicates a cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion 7 to 8 times higher than the original authors’ results (p < 0.001) and the typical average for pregnancy loss during this time period. In light of these findings, key policy decisions have been made using unreliable and questionable data. We conclude that the claims made using these data on the safety of exposure of women in early pregnancy to mRNA-based vaccines to prevent COVID-19 are unwarranted and recommend that those policy decisions be revisited.
From the conclusion…
Considering the evidence presented here, we suggest the immediate withdrawal of mRNA vaccine use in pregnancy (Category X)[41] and those breastfeeding, alongside the withdrawal of mRNA vaccines to children or those of child-bearing age in the general population, until more convincing data relating to the safety and long-term impacts on fertility, pregnancy and reproduction are established in these groups.
From the trenches:
Australian Registered Midwife 6yrs - AHPRA registration
I'm a midwife of 6 years who has recently moved into private practice.
My 3 years of training and 6 years of work in the public system was spent in a tertiary hospital, where we saw the full spectrum of pregnancy complications. I worked in antenatal clinic and often triaged referrals, therefore having access to lots and lots of ultrasound results.
The reason I bring this up, is that a close friend of mine is currently 20 weeks pregnant. She has been diagnosed with something called a subamniotic haematoma. Basically, a very large blood clot in between the 2 membranes surrounding the baby. This type of clot, from what research I have done, is usually only seen postnatally, caused by the placenta coming away from the uterus. It is *incredibly* rare for this condition to develop DURING pregnancy, and even rarer for it to be this size. I never saw anything like it in my time at a tertiary hospital. If the clot ruptures it could endanger her life, as well as the baby's.
She has no significant medical history that would predispose her to this, no clotting condition etc. But... she did have Pfizer early in her pregnancy. I have to wonder if there is any connection...
Thankfully I have stepped away from working in institutions and most women I see are choosing not to be vaccinated. It would be interesting to see if these types of conditions are increasing across the board...
In one case, a physician in Tennessee, at five weeks pregnant, suffered a miscarriage 13 days after being immunized with a Pfizer vaccine. The 31-year-old woman had no known allergies or medical history.
A 33-year-old Indiana nurse in her third week of pregnancy had a miscarriage five days after receiving her second Pfizer vaccine. She also reported that the adverse event caused a birth defect.
And a 32-year-old woman in Virginia who was eight weeks pregnant reported having a miscarriage five days after being injected with the first dose of a Moderna vaccine in January. She had consulted with two obstetrics and gynecologists (OB-GYN) prior to receiving the vaccine on Jan. 14. She experienced abdominal cramping and vaginal bleeding two days later and had a miscarriage on Jan. 19. She had only been taking prenatal vitamins.
In Michigan, a 35-year-old woman who was 28 weeks and five days pregnant said that the baby’s movements decreased two days after her first Pfizer vaccine in December 2020. The woman delivered a stillborn baby weighing two pounds and seven ounces at 29 weeks. She was being closely monitored for an umbilical cord abnormality called velamentous cord insertion.
Share this post
mRNA vaccines in pregnancy
Share this post
Can we trust any study that the CDC pushes to the front for the big agenda? Here’s a review on a study the CDC were using to demonstrate the safety of mRNA technology on pregnant women.
Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law Rapid Communication Spontaneous Abortions and Policies on COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Use During Pregnancy
ABSTRACT
From the conclusion…
From the trenches:
Australian Registered Midwife 6yrs - AHPRA registration
I'm a midwife of 6 years who has recently moved into private practice.
My 3 years of training and 6 years of work in the public system was spent in a tertiary hospital, where we saw the full spectrum of pregnancy complications. I worked in antenatal clinic and often triaged referrals, therefore having access to lots and lots of ultrasound results.
The reason I bring this up, is that a close friend of mine is currently 20 weeks pregnant. She has been diagnosed with something called a subamniotic haematoma. Basically, a very large blood clot in between the 2 membranes surrounding the baby. This type of clot, from what research I have done, is usually only seen postnatally, caused by the placenta coming away from the uterus. It is *incredibly* rare for this condition to develop DURING pregnancy, and even rarer for it to be this size. I never saw anything like it in my time at a tertiary hospital. If the clot ruptures it could endanger her life, as well as the baby's.
She has no significant medical history that would predispose her to this, no clotting condition etc. But... she did have Pfizer early in her pregnancy. I have to wonder if there is any connection...
Thankfully I have stepped away from working in institutions and most women I see are choosing not to be vaccinated. It would be interesting to see if these types of conditions are increasing across the board...
3 Dozen Cases of Spontaneous Miscarriages, Stillbirths Occurring After COVID-19 Vaccination
In one case, a physician in Tennessee, at five weeks pregnant, suffered a miscarriage 13 days after being immunized with a Pfizer vaccine. The 31-year-old woman had no known allergies or medical history.
A 33-year-old Indiana nurse in her third week of pregnancy had a miscarriage five days after receiving her second Pfizer vaccine. She also reported that the adverse event caused a birth defect.
And a 32-year-old woman in Virginia who was eight weeks pregnant reported having a miscarriage five days after being injected with the first dose of a Moderna vaccine in January. She had consulted with two obstetrics and gynecologists (OB-GYN) prior to receiving the vaccine on Jan. 14. She experienced abdominal cramping and vaginal bleeding two days later and had a miscarriage on Jan. 19. She had only been taking prenatal vitamins.
In Michigan, a 35-year-old woman who was 28 weeks and five days pregnant said that the baby’s movements decreased two days after her first Pfizer vaccine in December 2020. The woman delivered a stillborn baby weighing two pounds and seven ounces at 29 weeks. She was being closely monitored for an umbilical cord abnormality called velamentous cord insertion.