Nuremberg 2.0
Will we see a Nuremberg Trial 2.0?
70 years after the judgment at Nuremberg and in the face of increasing authoritarianism worldwide, whether contemporary physicians can claim membership in a profession that reflects the spirit of the code. (Moreno, et al., 2017)1
After WWII in Nuremberg Germany, 23 physicians and scientists stood trial for war crimes. The international military tribunal and medical trial left us with defining statements of ethical principles know as the Nuremberg Code. Part of that code reads
“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have the legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior forms of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.”
Many countries, especially Australia, are using draconian measures such as lockdowns, duress and threats to force citizens to take the COVID vaccines or be prohibited to participate in free society or keep a job.
These “vaccines” fail to meet the criteria of a vaccine as they are experimental gene therapy drugs. During the Nuremberg trials, not only were Nazi doctors found guilty of crimes against humanity, but the media was prosecuted and members were put to death for lying to the public - the same sort of lies we are now subject to from the mass media about these “vaccines” and the coercion to take them.
Faulty and inappropriate PCR tests are being used to justify so called “cases” and State of Emergency powers for governments to intimidate and force people to take this experimental gene therapy.
The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% faulty at 35 cycles. All the PCR tests overseen by the CDC are set at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC admits that any tests over 28 cycles are not admissible for a positive reliable result. This alone invalidates over 90% of the alleged covid cases / ”infections” tracked by the use of this faulty test.
In addition to the flawed tests and fraudulent death certificates, the “experimental” vaccine itself is in violation of Article 32 of the Geneva Convention. Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention IV, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not necessitated by the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited. According to Article 147, conducting biological experiments on protected persons is a grave breach of the Convention.
The “experimental” vaccine is in violation of all 10 of the Nuremberg Codes which carry the death penalty for those who seek to violate these International Laws.(https://rightforliberty.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/The-New-Nuremberg-Trials-2021.pdf)
Fortunately there is a German/Californian lawyer, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, and team (the Berlin Corona Committee) who are assembling the evidence required for a contemporary Nuremberg Trial and to halt human rights violations by increasingly totalitarian governments.
My intention is to simply point you to what this team is doing and the resources they have so far pulled together. They have about 180 hours of video - most of it testimony from experts. https://corona-ausschuss.de/en/
See also https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/10/03/david-martin-covid-fraud.aspx
Moreno JD, Schmidt U, Joffe S. The Nuremberg Code 70 Years Later. JAMA. 2017;318(9):795–796. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.10265