Reasons Not To Get The Jab
Some reasons for hesitancy on having an experimental gene therapy...
There are many reasons why one would want to pass on the offer to get “the jab” (the new gene therapy technology persistently called a ‘vaccine’ by governments and mainstream media but fails to meet the traditional definition of a vaccine1). I’ve listed a few reasons why I (and a few friends and readers - please contribute in the comments) would not want to have this drug/technology in my body with a few footnotes2:
Covid-19 has over a 99% average recovery rate without the ‘vaccine' - an outstandingly encouraging infection rate recovery figure5. The ‘vaccines’ do not elicit a strong enough immune response, nor a lasting one6 compared to natural immunity7, and there’s little evidence that its administration curbs infection rates8 and may increase infection. To put it bluntly the vaccines are a massive failure!9
The development of the Covid-19 “vaccination” program has been done extremely rapidly10 without the proper clinical trials11 usually required to ensure safety and efficacy12. Halting animal trials because the test subjects were dying13 doesn’t instil a lot of confidence. There is no long term safety data14 and we may not see all the trial data for a very long time15.
This is new technology and methodology, originally developed for other applications (like gene therapy for cancer treatment), and has completely unknown long-term effects - could we see a multitude of health conditions in the future?16 The inventor of mRNA therapy technology, Robert Malone17, is very outspoken about his serious concerns of the use of this therapy.
These ‘vaccines’, according to VAERS, have caused more deaths in the first 8 months than ALL other vaccines combined over the past 20 years21 and there is a constant stream of an overwhelming number of stories of vaccine damage22 and over a thousand scientific studies showing the danger of these drugs23.
The ‘vaccines’ may be increasing viral load24 and contributing to antibody dependent enhancement25 and pathogenic priming, thus increasing the risk of serious illness from SARS-CoV226. They are creating a “pandemic of the vaccinated”.27
Many lawyers, doctors, virologists, and other associated scientists and clinicians are speaking out and launching legal proceedings28 against the vaccine rollout and the narrative by Fauci, CDC, and many governments imposing vaccine mandates on their citizens.
The flu vaccine is generally recommended to and taken by the vulnerable and susceptible in consultation with their doctors (albeit with dubious results29 as with many vaccines30). There is no mass vaccination program to eliminate the flu. It may be actually very dangerous for humanity to vaccinate the young to this very specific CoV-2 spike31.
The PCR test was never designed to be a diagnostic test for active infection. It can have a high rate of false positives32, can be useless at high cycle rates, and are we sure exactly what it’s detecting33? Reasoning for mass vaccination rests on this unreliable and inappropriate test.
There is the possibility of developing prion disease34.
There is good evidence the vaccine doesn’t stay around the injection site to produce an immune response but migrates to many bodily systems37.
The COVID ‘vaccines’ are revealing some very strange things in their contents and doing some bizarre things in people’s blood43. There are more things in the vials than the companies detail, including potentially deadly parasites in the Pfizer vaccine44.
The ‘vaccines’ could lead to central nervous system inflammation causing neurological symptoms consistent with active CNS demyelination of the optic nerve, brain, and/or spinal cord45 and could be associated with functional neurological disorder46. Sudden onsets of Bell’s Palsy, seizures, and other neurological disorders immediately after or soon after the jab seems to becoming more common47.
There is a danger of inflammatory disease, and autoimmunity as a result of these vaccines, actually multiple system failures and a broad range of disorders48 including acquired immunodeficiency syndrome49 leading to more aggressive cancers and inability to fight off viruses and other pathogens50.
This new gene therapy technology may change my genome51 and I don’t feel it’s wise to be genetically modified. As one reader puts it “Resisting the lunatic transhumanist project of destroying life as we know it, which can only proceed if the rule of law has collapsed. That's a hard no, not a hesitant one.”
Countries are starting to stand down from mandating vaccines in light of injuries52. Italy and others have banned the Astrazeneca shot for under-60s. The Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden and Norway have banned the Moderna shot for under-40s53.
To summarise some of the above points, the ‘vaccines’ are proving to not be effective54 and the fully vaccinated may be more likely to get covid55. There’s evidence that the ‘vaccines’ may kill more people than it saves56 and according to Pfizer's own safety study, their vaccine caused far more "severe adverse events" than the number of "severe COVID-19" cases prevented57, especially for young people and children58.
The vaccine manufacturers have demanded, and have been given, total liability exemption59. Liability, and the accompanying potential for litigation, is the only thing that keeps big pharma (moderately) honest. Liability that should be totally on these companies that have either never brought a vaccine to market before or are serial felons, or both60.
There are many alternative treatments that may be much safer than these gene therapies61.
If propaganda has turned a majority of Israelis into people who are willing to blame and segregate other Israelis who have not had the C-19 vax62, what do you think it could have done to your democratic principles and capacity to be reasonable?63 As author Margaret Anna Alice64 points out - this is unfortunately a universal phenomenon with propaganda talking points such as “a pandemic of the unvaccinated” flooding the zone.
While the “fact checking”65 media reports deny the existence of graphene oxide in the mRNA vaccine vial, independent testing reveals it is in fact present as well as several reports confirming patent applications pertaining to the use of graphene oxide in vaccines66.
Whatever they’re up to67, it’s completely illogical to mandate an experimental treatment that’s unable to prevent68 infection, transmission and illness, and for the majority of the population seems more dangerous than the wild virus. In 50 years of trying, there has never been a successful coronavirus vaccine69 and it seems doubtful that they were able to solve the problem in a few months of 2020. Additionally the entire vaccination program may be putting evolutionary pressure on the virus, creating mutations of more virulent variants, while thwarting natural herd immunity. I’m hesitant to be part of this deliberate and coordinated trainwreck of humanity.
Solid, peer reviewed, scientific papers by experts in the field are being suppressed or retracted from journals70.
Government propaganda and totalitarian style control over the people makes me skeptical that this is about our health at all. Calling an experimental gene therapy a “vaccine”, creating media hype to maintain the illusion71 of a pandemic, demanding72 that we need the ‘vaccine’ to protect us without reasonable grounds73, locking us down with only detrimental effects74, demonizing the un-vaccinated as the ones maintaining the pandemic, calling freedom of choice “antivaxx”. When it seems mandating mass injection of an experimental gene therapy, under threat of fines and loss of income, is akin to domestic terrorism. Covering up the injuries being sustained by these injections, promoting completely false claims about the “safety and effectiveness” of the injections, and protecting Big Pharma75 and the government officials pushing the products is akin to a protection racket76. Sorry but I just don’t trust blatant criminals/terrorists, running a protection racket for billionaires, with no moral rectitude, to dictate what I put into my body - that’s just me.
Ultimately it is (or should be) my personal choice, not my social duty to the collective77 (especially given the points above). I take responsibility for my own medical decisions and those decisions impact just me - if I get the jab I’m not the solution and if I don’t, I’m not the problem.78 Like some serious guy has been debating with himself - my wearing a life jacket isn’t going to save everyone from drowning.79
Although the CDC have tried to change the definition of a ‘vaccine’ so mRNA technology can fit https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/09/read-cdc-changes-definition-of-vaccines-to-fit-covid-19-vaccine-limitations/ the continued failure of the mRNA drugs are still missing the mark (i.e. providing protection). It seems efficacy immediately after the jab may be zero to negative (causes harm) as there is a window of immune suppression before there is a window of mild symptom reduction before the effect disappears and a ‘booster’ is required.
There are some chunks of text in the footnotes below that have come directly from https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23/51 - a paper that makes for a good reference to build a compelling narrative against the mRNA vaccines.
Overall deaths just don’t indicate thousands of bodies in the streets, which is what we were led to believe at the beginning of 2020 (this hasn’t been like the movie Contagion). Here’s a study on the Canadian experience, and in my own neck of the woods there doesn’t seem to be a lot to make a fuss about - the trend looks overall a negative mortality rate from the norm (although the authorities will say it’s because of the massive lockdowns that we were not really touched by the pandemic)…
The vast majority of covid deaths and serious illness have been among the elderly with comorbid conditions, and even then the majority are dying beyond the average life expectancy. For people who don’t have multiple serious illnesses, it seems the virus is no more deadly than the flu. The younger you are the less likely that you will get seriously ill or any symptoms at all. There just doesn’t seem to be enough justification for an experimental gene therapy that has very little, if any, efficacy.
COVID-19 Deaths and Survival Innate health vs Pharmaceutical Intervention ( A Focus on the Numbers) http://perfekt.media/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/COVID19_Deaths_and_Survival_Innate_Health_vs_Pharmaceutical_Intervention.pdf
Israel was the first country globally to fully vaccinate 69% of its 9.3 million population over the age of 16 against COVID-19. The distribution of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine began in December 2020 and people were deemed to be fully protected a week after receiving the second shot. However, by mid-August it was reported that Israel had one of the world’s highest daily infection rates, doubling in a mere two weeks to an average of nearly 7,500 cases a day, which equated to nearly one in every 150 people with the virus. The Ministry of Health in Israel, the effectiveness of 2 doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine against preventing COVID-19 infection was reported to be 39% , substantially lower than the trial efficacy of 96%. It also emerged that immunity derived from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine perhaps was not as strong as is required. (The Expose)
Selecting just one of the references brings up the study “SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls”, whichshows that although antibodies wane, T cell immunity from those who recovered from a SARS infection in 2002-03 are still strong 17 years later showing us that T cell immunity to coronaviruses last long time. In fact Gandhi points to a paper that shows 32 people ages 91-101 who survived 1918 flu pandemic STILL had memory B cells that could produce neutralizing antibodies to that strain 9 decades later! Nevertheless, these studies in favour of natural immunity are not considered by our government and to this date the vaccines are being not only administered, but mandated. (The Expose)
A study from Harvard University found that across 68 countries, including 2947 counties in the United States that it was the vaccinated who were at a greater risk of COVID-19-related hospitalizations compared to those who were previously infected. According to the research team, 60% of the population of Israel had been fully vaccinated, yet they had the highest COVID-19 cases per 1 million people in the 7 days previous to the study. This was also the case in Iceland and Portugal who had fully vaccinated over 75% of the population, yet have more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people compared to countries such as Vietnam and South Africa that have around 10% of their population fully vaccinated. Clearly showing that there is not a strong argument for continuing with the administration of the vaccines.
…the recent reports from Israel’s Ministry of Health caught my eye. In early July, they reported that efficacy against infection and symptomatic disease “fell to 64%.” By late July it had fallen to 39% where Delta is the dominant strain. This is very low. For context, the FDA’s expectation is of “at least 50%” efficacy for any approvable vaccine. (Dr. Peter Doshi (editor of the British Medical Journal—BMJ)
The absolute-risk reduction a jab confers is 1.3% decreased risk at best according to a Lancet paper.
UK data mid 2021 suggests there is no benefit to the vaccines…
Grossly inadequate animal trials, and human clinical trials - few numbers, not long enough follow up.
The real clinical trial is a world-wide human one, without a control group, and it’s demonstrating little capacity to reduce transmission, infection, or death, while also demonstrating the capacity to injure and kill 1,000 times more people on a yearly basis than all the other vaccine programs put together.
Animal trials for the Pfizer and Moderna injections were halted in the Fall of 2020, even though much valuable information concerning long-term side effects is only gained though the normal three to six years of animal trials. Why these would be halted is a mystery.
We have no idea what the long term effects will be of this gene therapy, especially given that they have not been able to get this technology to work prior to COVID and so there is no clinical data to look at.
Papers below highlight that specialized blood vessel cells called pericytes have receptors called CD147s. The novel coronavirus itself (Sars-Cov-2) cannot attack these CD147s and damage the pericyte cells, potentially leading to clotting and heart attacks. But free-floating spike protein – like the spike protein the vaccines make our bodies produce – can. The researchers didn’t specifically look at vaccine-generated spike proteins; they were looking instead at the potential for spike proteins in people infected with the virus itself to cause damage. But they were clear about the implications of their findings:
“Importantly, we show that the recombinant S protein alone elicits cellular signalling through the CD147 receptor in cardiac [cells], thereby inducing cell dysfunction and microvascular disruption in vitro.”
And the spike protein looks and functions essentially the same whether it is generated as part of the virus or through the vaccine. And a paper published in May showed that 11 of 13 people had measurable levels of spike proteins in their blood following vaccination. (see papers below)
Lei, Y., Zhang, J., Schiavon, C. R., He, M., Chen, L., Shen, H., Zhang, Y., Yin, Q., Cho, Y., Andrade, L., Shadel, G. S., Hepokoski, M., Lei, T., Wang, H., Zhang, J., Yuan, J. X., Malhotra, A., Manor, U., Wang, S., Yuan, Z. Y., … Shyy, J. Y. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE2. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2020.12.04.409144. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.04.409144
Circulating Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients
Alana F Ogata, Chi-An Cheng, Michaël Desjardins, Yasmeen Senussi, Amy C Sherman, Megan Powell, Lewis Novack, Salena Von, Xiaofang Li, Lindsey R Baden … Show more
Clinical Infectious Diseases, ciab465, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab465
The SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein disrupts human cardiac pericytes function through CD147-receptor-mediated signalling: a potential non-infective mechanism of COVID-19 microvascular disease
Elisa Avolio, Michele Carrabba, Rachel Milligan, Maia Kavanagh Williamson, Antonio P Beltrami, Kapil Gupta, Karen T Elvers, Monica Gamez, Rebecca Foster, Kathleen Gillespie, Fergus Hamilton, David Arnold, Imre Berger, Massimo Caputo, Andrew D Davidson, Darryl Hill, Paolo Madeddu
bioRxiv 2020.12.21.423721; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.21.423721
We were told the injected spike proteins would stay hyper-local in the shoulder and thus the immune system would surround the enemy, learn its ways, clean up the injection site, and humoral (memory) immunity would confer protection. As it turns out, the logic of that first assumption makes as much sense as having a peeing section in a pool. In what’s called a “biodistribution study” Japanese researchers found the spike protein (which is toxic) was able to travel through the entire body—including across the highly-sensitive, blood-brain barrier. The highest concentration of these spike proteins was actually found in the ovaries. Perhaps this explains why in Pfizer’s own study (see page 67) they acknowledged there is a risk for pregnant women (via “inhalation and skin contact”) if exposed to someone who has had the vaccine. Might that explain the reports of menstrual, fertility and miscarriage issues in women? (deconstructingconventional.com)
“SARS–CoV–2 spike protein significantly inhibits DNA damage repair, which is required for effective V(D)J recombination in adaptive immunity. Mechanistically, we found that the spike protein localizes in the nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair by impeding key DNA repair protein BRCA1 and 53BP1 recruitment to the damage site. Our findings reveal a potential molecular mechanism by which the spike protein might impede adaptive immunity and underscore the potential side effects of full-length spike-based vaccines.”
This paper says spike proteins enter cell nuclei and wreak havoc on cells’ DNA repair mechanism, suppressing DNA repair by as much as 90% - an absolutely devastating situation. DNA errors (from a multitude of factors), when expressed through cell division and replication, result in:
An explosion of cancer and cancer tumors throughout the body
Loss of production of immune system B and T cells (i.e. induced immunodeficiency)
Accelerated aging and reduced telomere length
Loss of functioning of complex organ systems such as circulatory, neurological, endocrine, muskuloskeletal, etc.
Cellular damage resembling radiation poisoning as cells destroy themselves from within
If there is a greatly reduced process of repair these DNA errors will be fatal or debilitating.
Especially if you have preexisting conditions such as diabetes. This study recommends additional caution when vaccinating people with pre-existing clinical conditions, including diabetes, electrolyte imbalances, renal dysfunction, and coagulation disorders.
But wait you (might) protest, aren’t those numbers skewed because no other vaccine has been used this widely? The answer is no. Here’s an adjusted graph to account for that objection.
No matter what way you may want to pivot the data, the graph stubbornly looks the same. This would explain why the covid jab has killed more active-duty military than covid has. This would explain why funeral-home directors (like this brave one) are reporting an excessive amount of mortality (business) from families whose loved ones have taken the jab. In short, we’re vastly over-counting covid cases and deaths, and vastly, intentionally, dismissively, undercounting death and adverse reactions. In a sworn affidavit, a CDC whistleblower said the numbers for covid-jab adverse reactions are under reported by at least a factor of five.(https://www.deconstructingconventional.com/post/17-more-reasons-i-won-t-be-getting-a-covid-vaccine)
Queensland nurses and paramedics are interviewed about the dangers of the covid vaccines https://rumble.com/vp3h2w-whistleblowers-speak-on-covid-19-vaccine-injuries-long.html
With several virus families—in particular with Dengue virus, but also with coronaviruses—antibodies can aggravate rather than mitigate disease. This occurs because certain cells of the immune system take up antibody-tagged microbes and destroy them. If a virus particle to which antibodies have bound is taken up by such a cell, but it then manages to evade destruction, it may instead start to multiply within the cell. Overall, the antibody will then have enhanced the replication of the virus. Clinically, this antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) can cause a hyperinflammatory response (a “cytokine storm”) that will amplify the damage to the lungs, liver and other organs of our body. Attempts to develop vaccines to the original SARS virus, which is closely related to SARS-CoV-2, repeatedly failed due to ADE. The vaccines did induce antibodies, but when the vaccinated animals were subsequently infected with the virus, they became more ill than the unvaccinated controls. The possibility of ADE was not adequately addressed in the clinical trials on any of the COVID-19 vaccines. It is therefore prudent to avoid the danger of inducing ADE through vaccination and instead rely on proven forms of treatment for dealing with clinically severe COVID-19 disease.
Jaume, M., Yip, M. S., Cheung, C. Y., Leung, H. L., Li, P. H., Kien, F., Dutry, I., Callendret, B., Escriou, N., Altmeyer, R., Nal, B., Daëron, M., Bruzzone, R., & Peiris, J. S. (2011). Anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike antibodies trigger infection of human immune cells via a pH- and cysteine protease-independent FcγR pathway. Journal of virology, 85(20), 10582–10597. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00671-11
Li, D., Edwards, R. J., Manne, K., Martinez, D. R., Schäfer, A., Alam, S. M., Wiehe, K., Lu, X., Parks, R., Sutherland, L. L., Oguin, T. H., McDanal, C., Perez, L. G., Mansouri, K., Gobeil, S., Janowska, K., Stalls, V., Kopp, M., Cai, F., Lee, E., … Saunders, K. O. (2021). The functions of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing and infection-enhancing antibodies in vitro and in mice and nonhuman primates. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2020.12.31.424729. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.31.424729
The more vaccinated a country (or state) becomes, the more there is a corresponding surge in covid deaths, and the surge is typically higher than the natural, pre-jab peak.
A large team of more than 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts, led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, has initiated legal proceedings against the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), WOrld Health Organization (WHO), and the Davos Group, for crimes against humanity. https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/world/1-000-lawyers-and-10-000-doctors-have-filed-a-lawsuit-for-covid-19-vaccine-violations-of-the-nuremberg-code
3 Cochrane reviews have considered the effects of flu vaccines:
The first Cochrane review looked at the effects of the influenza vaccine in healthy adults from 25 studies conducted over single influenza seasons in North America, South America, and Europe between 1969 and 2009. It found the vaccine reduced the chance of getting laboratory confirmed influenza from 23 cases out of 1,000 to 9 cases out of 1,000. While this seems to be a reduction of more than 50%, that seems less optimistic expressed in absolute terms. The infection rate in adults drops from 2% per year to 1%. You could say that’s halved, but it effectively only drops by 1%. So this means that out of every 100 healthy adults vaccinated, 99 get no benefit against laboratory confirmed influenza.
The second Cochrane review – which looked at trials in children over single influenza seasons in the US, Western Europe, Russia, and Bangladesh between 1984 and 2013 – found similar results.
The third Cochrane review looked at vaccines for the elderly in nursing homes. It found much less good evidence, with only one randomised trial – considered the gold standard in clinical trials as it establishes causation rather than correlation.
There are also potential harms from influenza vaccines noted in the reviews. They range from serious (a neurological disease called Guillain Barre) through to moderate (fevers, in children especially – some of which will cause febrile convulsions), and trivial (a sore arm for a couple of days).
During the early period of 2020 there was a drop in child vaccinations for various reasons related to lockdowns, etc. We may have seen an incredible dip in infant mortality due to a moderate reduction of childhood vaccinations.
In chasing an empty fantasy of herd immunity, authorities are denying human populations everywhere the opportunity to develop the layered, population-wide resistance against successive SARS-2 strains that is the foundation of our immunity against other respiratory viruses. Aside from the minority that have managed to recover from natural infection before the vaccinators got to them, most humans will have their crucial, primary immune response conditioned by the spike protein of SARS-2 in its vintage 2020 configuration.
It is a near certainty that this immunity will attenuate antibody responses to the spike protein of current and future variants, forever. Mutant spike proteins will increasingly escape vaccine-conferred immunity, and breakthrough infections will elicit only partial response to the new epitopes. Insofar as the data also suggest that our vaccines will attenuate immunity to other virus proteins beyond spike, mass vaccination will lead to ever more volatile waves of infection – in exchange for limited and fading protection against severe outcomes.
The most dangerous thing to do, at this point, would be to vaccinate children. The virus is not a threat to them, and if they are infected by the new forms of SARS-2 that are sure to emerge every winter, we will begin to establish – through them and the as yet unvaccinated – the layered immunity that is the only way of coming to terms with SARS-2 in the longer term. As long as the vaccinators are permitted to continue their radical and increasingly insane campaign, though, nothing will improve. Indeed, their policies threaten to bring about a semi-permanent pandemic state for generations to come.
I’m not a virologist, I don’t know if isolating the virus is an important thing or not. In personal communication with a local virologist researcher, he said it’s not necessary to completely isolate the virus - we can ‘construct’ what it is out of a ‘soup’ of DNA particles and using computer technology piece together what the virus is (genetically). I have no idea if this is true or not, but it seems others are saying that not having an isolated virus is a problem:
An FDA document admits “Covid” PCR test was developed without isolated samples for test calibration, effectively admitting it’s testing something else. They openly admits that the infamous PCR test for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) was developed not with actual samples, but rather with what appears to be genetic material from a common cold virus.
In the FDA document, it is clearly stated that ordinary seasonal flu genetic material was used as the testing marker in the PCR test kits because the authorities knew that many people would test “positive” for it, thus allowing them to use these results to create the “Covid” narrative. It is somewhat of a lengthy read, but have a look for yourself and see the deception in plain sight. There is no legitimate test out there that accurately identifies the presence of SARS-CoV-2. From the document:
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.”
Another revelation in the document is the admission by the FDA that test results are “pooled” together to produce numbers that are inaccurate. The FDA is quite literally manufacturing data to support a false narrative.
Prion diseases are a collection of neurodegenerative diseases that are induced through the misfolding of important bodily proteins, which form toxic oligomers that eventually precipitate out as fibrils causing widespread damage to neurons. Stanley Prusiner first coined the name `prion’ to describe these misfolded proteins (Prusiner, 1982). The best-known prion disease is MADCOW disease (bovine spongiform encephalopathy), which became an epidemic in European cattle beginning in the 1980s. The CDC web site on prion diseases states that “prion diseases are usually rapidly progressive and always fatal.”(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018). https://www.cdc.gov/prions/
Prusiner, S. B. (1982). Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie Science 216(4542): 136-44. https://www.doi.org/10.1126/science.6801762.
A paper published by J. Bart Classen (2021) proposed that the spike protein in the mRNA vaccines could cause prion-like diseases, in part through its ability to bind to many known proteins and induce their misfolding into potential prions. Idrees and Kumar (2021) have proposed that the spike protein’s S1 component is prone to act as a functional amyloid and form toxic aggregates. These authors wrote that S1 has the ability “to form amyloid and toxic aggregates that can act as seeds to aggregate many of the misfolded brain proteins and can ultimately lead to neurodegeneration.”According to Tetz and Tetz (2020), the form of the spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 has prion regions that are not present in the spike proteins for other coronaviruses. While this was reported in a non-peer-reviewed article, the authors had published a previous paper in 2018 identifying prion-like regions in multiple eukaryotic viruses, so they have considerable expertise in this area (Tetz and Tetz, 2018).
Classen, J. B. (2021). US COVID-19 Vaccines proven to cause more harm than good based on pivotal clinical trial data analyzed using the proper scientific endpoint, “All Cause Severe Morbidity”. Trends in Internal Medicine, 1(1), 1-6.
Classen, J. B. (2021). Review of COVID-19 Vaccines and the Risk of Chronic Adverse Events Including Neurological Degeneration. Journal of Medical-Clinical Research and Reviews 5(4): 1-7. https://foundationforhealthresearch.org/review-of-covid-19-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-chronic-adverse-events/.
Idrees D, Kumar V. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein interactions with amyloidogenic proteins: Potential clues to Neurodegeneration. Biochemical and Biophysical Re- search Com- munications. 2021; 554: 94-98. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.03.100.
Tetz, G. and Tetz, V. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 Prion-Like Domains in Spike Proteins Enable Higher Affinity to ACE2.
Preprints 2020030422. https://www.doi.org/10.20944/preprints202003. 0422.v1.
Tetz, G. and Tetz,V (2018). Prion-like Domains in Eukaryotic Viruses. Scientific Reports 8: 8931. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27256-w.
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) Public Assessment Report is a document submitted to gain approval to market the vaccine in Europe. It describes in detail a review of the manufacturing process as well as a wide range of associated testing data. One concerning revelation about the Pfizer vaccine is the presence of “fragmented species” of RNA in the injection solution. These are RNA fragments resulting from early termination of the process of transcription from the DNA template.
These fragments, if translated by the cell following injection, would generate incomplete spike proteins, again resulting in altered and unpredictable three-dimensional structure and a physiological impact that is at best neutral and at worst detrimental to cellular functioning. There were considerably more of these fragmented forms of RNA found in the commercially manufactured products than in the products used in clinical trials. The latter were produced via a much more tightly controlled manufacturing process.
Pfizer claims the RNA fragments “likely… will not result in expressed proteins” due to their assumed rapid degradation within the cell. No data was presented to rule out protein expression, though, leaving the reviewers to comment, “These [fragmented RNA] forms are poorly characterised, and the limited data provided for protein expression do not fully address the uncertainties relating to the risk of translating proteins/peptides other than the intended spike protein” (EMA 2020). To our knowledge no data has been forthcoming since that time.
EMA Public Assessment Report on Pfizer-BioNTech Vaccine. (2020). Accessed 5/2/21. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20516010-ema-assessment-report-12-21- 2020#document/p35/a2023027
Several studies on mRNA-based vaccines have confirmed independently that the spleen is a major center of activity for the immune response. A study on an mRNA-based influenza virus vaccine is extremely relevant for answering the question of the biodistribution of the mRNA in the vaccine. This vaccine, like the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, was designed as lipid nanoparticles with modified RNA coding for hemagglutinin (the equivalent surface fusion protein to the spike protein in corona viruses), and was administered through muscular injection. The concentration of mRNA was tracked over time in various tissue samples, and the maximum concentration observed at each site was recorded.
Not surprisingly, the concentration was highest in the muscle at the injection site (5,680 ng/mL). This level decreased slowly over time, reaching half the original value at 18.8 hours following injection. The next highest level was observed in the proximal lymph node, peaking at 2,120 ng/mL and not dropping to half this value until 25.4 hours later. Among organs, the highest levels by far were found in the spleen (86.69 ng/mL) and liver (47.2 ng/mL). Elsewhere in the body the concentration was at 100-to 1,000-fold lower levels. In particular, distal lymph nodes only had a peak concentration of 8 ng/mL.
They concluded that the mRNA distributes from the injection site to the liver and spleen via the lymphatic system, ultimately reaching the general circulation. This likely happens through its transport inside macrophages and other immune cells that take it up at the muscular injection site. Disturbingly, it also reaches into the brain, although at much lower levels (Bahl et al., 2017).
Bahl, K., Senn, J. J., Yuzhakov, O., Bulychev, A., Brito, L. A., Hassett, K. J Ciaramella, G. (2017). Preclinical and Clinical Demonstration of Immunogenicity by mRNA Vaccines against H10N8 and H7N9 Influenza Viruses. Molecular Therapy 25(6): 1316-1327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.035.
The European Medicines Agency assessment report for the Moderna vaccine also noted that mRNA could be detected in the brain following intramuscular administration at about 2% of the level found in the plasma (European Medicines Agency, 2021). In another experiment conducted to track the biodistribution pathway of RNA vaccines, a rabies RNA vaccine was administered intramuscularly to rats in a single dose. The vaccine included a code for an immunogenic rabies protein as well as the code for RNA polymerase and was formulated as an oil-in-water nanoemulsion. Thus, it is not entirely representative of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. Nevertheless, its intramuscular administration and its dependence on RNA uptake by immune cells likely means that it would migrate through the tissues in a similar pathway as the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The authors observed an enlargement of the draining lymph nodes, and tissue studies revealed that the rabies RNA appeared initially at the injection site and in the draining lymph nodes within one day, and was also found in blood, lungs, spleen and liver (Stokes et al., 2020). These results are consistent with the above study on influenza mRNA vaccines.
European Medicines Agency. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Assessment report. COVID- 19 Vaccine Moderna. Common name: COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine (nucleoside-modified) Procedure. No. EMEA/H/C/005791/0000. March 11 2021. p. 47. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment- report/covid-19-vaccine-moderna-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf
Stokes, A., Pion, J., Binazon, O., Laffont, B., Bigras, M., Dubois, G. Rodriguez L.-A. (2020). Nonclinical Safety Assessment of Repeated Administration and Biodistribution of a Novel Rabies Self-amplifying mRNA Vaccine in Rats. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 113: 104648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104648.
Finally, a study comparing luciferase-expressing mRNA nanoparticles with luciferase-expressing mRNA dendritic cells as an alternative approach to vaccination revealed that the luciferase signal reached a broader range of lymphoid sites with the nanoparticle delivery mechanism. More importantly, the luciferase signal was concentrated in the spleen for the nanoparticles compared to dominance in the lungs for the dendritic cells (Firdessa-Fite and Creuso, 2020).
Firdessa-Fite, R. & Creusot, R. J. (2020). Nanoparticles versus Dendritic Cells as Vehicles to Deliver mRNA Encoding Multiple Epitopes for Immunotherapy. Molecular Therapy: Methods & Clinical Development 16: 50-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2019.10.015.
Cardiac problems abound with the mRNA technology:
Anaphylaxis reactions to vaccines prior to these COVID-19 vaccines were generally reported at rates less than 2 cases per million vaccinations (McNeil et al., 2016), while the current rate with the COVID-19 vaccinations was reported by the CDC to be more than 11 cases per million (CDC COVID-19 Response Team, 2021, January 29). However, a published prospective study on 64,900 medical employees, where their reactions to their first mRNA vaccination were carefully monitored, found that 2.1% of the subjects reported acute allergic reactions. A more extreme reaction involving anaphylaxis occurred at a rate of 247 per million vaccinations (Blumenthal et al., 2021). This is more than 21 times as many as were initially reported by the CDC. The second injection exposure is likely to cause even larger numbers of anaphylactic reactions.
Blumenthal, K. G., Robinson, L. B., Camargo, C. Jr., Shenoy, E. S., Banerji, A., Landman, A. B., Wickner, P. (2021) Acute Allergic Reactions to mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines. Journal of the American Medical Association 325(15):1562-1565. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.3976.
CDC COVID-19 Response Team; Food and Drug Administration (2021, January 29). Allergic Reactions Including Anaphylaxis After Receipt of the First Dose of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine-United States. December 21, 2020 — January 10, 2021. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 70(4): 125-129. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7004e1.htm.
McNeil, M. M., Weintraub, E. S., Duffy, J., Sukumaran, L., Jacobsen, S. J., Klein, N. P DeStefano, F. (2016). Risk of Anaphylaxis after Vaccination in Children and Adults. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 137(3): 868-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2015.07.048.
Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
Adjuvants are vaccine additives intended to “elicit distinctive immunological profiles with regard to the direction, duration, and strength of immune responses” from the vaccines to which they are added.
The vaccine produced by Pfizer/BioNTech creates nanoparticles from 2-[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, or ALC-0159, commonly abbreviated simply as PEG. The Moderna vaccine contains another PEG variant, SM-102, 1,2-dimyristoyl-rac-glycero-3-methoxypolyethylene glycol2000. In an article published in May 2019, prior to large clinical trials involving these PEGylated vaccines, Mohamed et. al. (2019) described a number of concerning findings regarding PEG and the immunological activation it had been shown to produce, which includes humoral, cell-mediated, and complement-based activation. They note that, paradoxically, large injection doses of PEG cause no apparent allergic reaction. Small doses, though, can lead to dramatic pathological immune activation. Vaccines employing PEGylation utilize micromolar amounts of these lipids, constituting this potentially immunogenic low-dose exposure. In animal studies it has been shown that complement activation is responsible for both anaphylaxis and cardiovascular collapse, and injected PEG activates multiple complement pathways in humans as well. The authors of one study conclude by noting that “This cascade of secondary mediators substantially amplifies effector immune responses and may induce anaphylaxis in sensitive individuals. Indeed, recent studies in pigs have demonstrated that systemic complement activation (e.g., induced following intravenous injection of PEGylated liposomes) can underlie cardiac anaphylaxis where C5a played a causal role.” (Hamad et al., 2008).
Hamad, I., Hunter, A. C., Szebeni, J. & Moghimi, S. M. (2008). Poly (Ethylene Glycol)s Generate Complement Activation Products in Human Serum through Increased Alternative Pathway Turnover and a MASP-2-Dependent Process. Molecular immunology 46(2): 225-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2008.08.276.
Mohamed, M., Lila, A. S., Shimizu, T., Alaaeldin, E., Hussein, A., Sarhan, H. A., Szebeni, J. & Ishida, T. (2019).PEGylated Liposomes: Immunological Responses. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials 20(1): 710-724. https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2019.1627174.
See this paper outlining the potential dangers of the toxic cationic lipids in the mRNA vaccines. Here’s a summary:
Pfizer’s animal data clearly presaged the following risks and dangers:
blood clotting shortly after vaccination, potentially leading to heart attacks,
stroke, and venous thrombosis
grave harm to female fertility
grave harm to breastfed infants
cumulative toxicity after multiple injections
A 38-year old woman who got her first dose of Pfizer’s vaccine and quickly developed weakness around her ear, mouth, left arm and leg. She went to the ER the next day and was diagnosed with Bell’s palsy or a transient ischemic attack. Problems continued months later, including memory issues, and she was diagnosed with FND.
A 36-year-old woman who got her second dose of Moderna and quickly noticed weakness in right hand and right leg limping. A day later she reported severe leg heaviness, fatigue, movement difficulties. After physical therapy her right-side weakness improved but she awoke weeks later with left-side weakness, tightness and heaviness in neck, difficulties with daily living, rapid muscle fatigue, dragging right foot, and tremor. She was diagnosed with FND.
As well as many other neurological disorders - see https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/08/covid-19-vaccine-analysis-the-most-common-adverse-events-reported-so-far/
It is now becoming clear these shots, at least temporarily, turn off your immune system’s ability to recognize friend from foe. Part of the mechanism of action (for which a Nobel Prize was awarded) is that these injections cause the “toll-like receptors” of our immune system to not attack foreign mRNA. Toll-like receptors are the gatekeepers that empower the immune system to do things like:
Recognize native vs. foreign mRNA
Distinguish healthy cells from cancer cells
Put viruses in check so they remain dormant
With regard to covid specifically, according to this study in the journal Science: The naturally infected “recuse their B-cells and T-cells” when they take these shots. In plain English, (see if this sounds familiar) the jab causes the immune system of previously naturally-infected people to become deer-in-the-headlights blind to any version of covid that doesn’t have the original, un-mutated, spike protein. It would make sense then that an Israeli study confirmed that you’re 13 times more likely to get a breakthrough infection if you get the jab. It would also explain why another Israeli study showed that 40% of new covid patients were vaccinated – compared to just 1% who were previously infected. The problem is these jabs are showing signs of damaging the immune system. According to this study, the vaccinated appear to have a “total immune system degradation of 40% of their immune-system capability. In other words, the shots regress overall immune function, significantly.(Deconstructingconventional.com)
It has been claimed that mRNA-based vaccines are safer than DNA-vectored vaccines that work by incorporating the genetic code for the target antigenic protein into a DNA virus, because the RNA cannot become inadvertently incorporated into the human genome. However, it is not at all clear that this is true.
The classic model of DNA → RNA → protein is now known to be false. It is now indisputable that there is a large class of viruses called retroviruses that carry genes that reverse transcribe RNA back into complementary DNA (cDNA). In 1975, Howard Temin, Renato Dulbecco, and David Baltimore shared the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1975 for their discovery of reverse transcriptase and its synthesis by retroviruses (such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)) to derive DNA from RNA (Temin and Mizutani, 1970, Baltimore, 1970).
Temin, H. M. and Mizutani, S. (1970). RNA-dependent DNA polymerase in virions of Rous Sarcoma Virus. Nature 226: 1211–3. https://www.doi.org/10.1038/2261211a0.
Baltimore, D. (1970). Viral RNA-dependent DNA Polymerase: RNA-dependent DNA Polymerase in visions of RNA Tumor Viruses. Nature 226(5252): 1209-1211. https://doi.org/10.1038/2261209a0.
Much later, it was discovered that reverse transcriptase is not unique to retroviruses. More than a third of the human genome is devoted to mysterious mobile DNA elements called SINEs and LINEs (short and long interspersed nuclear elements, respectively). LINEs provide reverse transcriptase capabilities to convert RNA into DNA, and SINEs provide support for integrating the DNA into the genome. Thus, these elements provide the tools needed to convert RNA into DNA and incorporate it into the genome so as to maintain the new gene through future generations (Weiner, 2002).
Weiner, A. M. (2002). SINEs and LINEs: the Art of Biting the Hand that Feeds You. Current Opinions in Cell Biology 14(3): 343-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0955-0674(02)00338-1.
SINEs and LINEs are members of a larger class of genetic elements called retrotransposons. Retrotransposons can copy and paste their DNA to a new site in the genome via an RNA intermediate, while possibly introducing genetic alterations in the process (Pray, 2008). Retrotransposons, also known as “jumping genes,” were first identified by the geneticist Barbara McClintock of ColdSpring Harbor Laboratory in New York, over 50 years ago (McClintock, 1965). Much later, in 1983, she was recognized with a Nobel prize for this work.
McClintock, B. (1965). Components of Action of the Regulators Spm and Ac. Carnegie Institution of Washington Year Book 64: 527-536. http://repository.cshl.edu/id/eprint/34634/.
Pray, L. (2008) Transposons, or Jumping Genes: Not Junk DNA? Nature Education 1(1): 32. https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/transposons-or-jumping-genes-not-junk-dna-1211/.
Remarkably, retrotransposons seem to be able to expand their domain from generation to generation. LINEs and SINEs collaborate to invade new genomic sites through translation of their DNA to RNA and back to a fresh copy of DNA, which is then inserted at an AT-rich region of the genome. These LINEs and SINEs had long been considered to be “junk” DNA, an absurd idea that has now been dispelled, as awareness of their critical functions has grown. In particular, it has now become clear that they can also import RNA from an exogenous source into a mammalian host’s DNA. Retroviral-like repeat elements found in the mouse genome called intracisternal A particles (IAPs) have been shown to be capable of incorporating viral RNA into the mouse genome. Recombination between an exogenous nonretroviral RNA virus and an IAP retrotansposon resulted in reverse transcription of the viral RNA and integration into the host’s genome (Geuking et al., 2009).
Geuking, M. B., Weber, J., Dewannieux, M., Gorelik, E., Heidmann, T., Hengartner, H., … Hangartner, L. (2009). Recombination of Retrotransposon and Exogenous RNA Virus Results in Nonretroviral cDNA Integration. Science 323(5912): 393-6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167375.
Furthermore, the mRNA in the new SARS-CoV-2 vaccines could also get passed on from generation to generation, with the help of LINEs expressed in sperm, via non-integrated cDNA encapsulated in plasmids. The implications of this predictable phenomenon are unclear, but potentially far-reaching.
Researchers from MIT and Harvard published a disturbing paper in 2021, where they provided strong evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse transcribed into DNA and integrated into human DNA (Zhang et al., 2021). They were led to investigate this idea after having observed that many patients continue to test positive for COVID-19 after the virus has already been cleared from their body. The authors found chimeric transcripts that contained viral DNA sequences fused to cellular DNA sequences in patients who had recovered from COVID-19. Since COVID-19 often induces a cytokine storm in severe cases, they confirmed the possibility of enhanced reverse transcriptase activity through an in vitro study using cytokine-containing conditioned media in cell cultures. They found a 2-3-fold up-regulation of endogenous LINE-1 expression in response to cytokines. The exogenous RNA from the virus incorporated into human DNA could produce fragments of viral proteins indefinitely after the infection has been cleared, and this yields a false-positive on a PCR test.
Zhang, L., Richards, A., Barrasa, M, I., Hughes, S. H., Young, R. A. & Jaenisch, R. (2021). Reverse-transcribed SARS- CoV-2 RNA can Integrate into the Genome of Cultured Human Cells and can be Expressed in Patient-derived Tissues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(21): e2105968118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105968118.
 The so-called central dogma of molecular biology states that all genetic information flows in one direction: from DNA to RNA through the process of transcription, and then from RNA to protein through the process of translation (Crick, 1958). For over a decade, the central dogma was thought to be a universal truth–in other words, researchers believed that genetic information always flowed in this order, otherwise it could not be passed along. In 1970, however, the two experiments mentioned in the Nature quote–one conducted by David Baltimore, then of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, and the other by Howard Temin and Satoshi Mizutani, then of the University of Wisconsin in Madison–called this belief into question. Specifically, these researchers independently published scientific papers demonstrating that RNA tumor viruses contain enzymes that use viral RNA as a template for the synthesis of DNA, thereby reversing the direction of transcription (Baltimore, 1970; Temin & Mizutani, 1970). Not only did these two experiments challenge the validity of the central dogma, but they also laid the foundation for a series of technological developments that eventually earned reverse transcription and the synthesis of complementary DNA, or cDNA, central places in the molecular biologist’s toolbox.
 Retrotransposons (also called Class I transposable elements or transposons via RNA intermediates) are a type of genetic component that copy and paste themselves into different genomic locations (transposon) by converting RNA back into DNA through the process reverse transcription using an RNA transposition intermediate.
 An unresolved issue of SARS-CoV-2 disease is that patients often remain positive for viral RNA as detected by PCR many weeks after the initial infection in the absence of evidence for viral replication. We show here that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of the infected cell and be expressed as chimeric transcripts fusing viral with cellular sequences. Importantly, such chimeric transcripts are detected in patient-derived tissues. Our data suggest that, in some patient tissues, the majority of all viral transcripts are derived from integrated sequences. Our data provide an in- sight into the consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infections that may help to explain why patients can continue to produce viral RNA after recovery.
𝗦𝘄𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗗𝗲𝗻𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸 𝘀𝘂𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮 𝗖𝗢𝗩𝗜𝗗 𝘃𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽𝘀 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗸𝘀
𝗜𝗰𝗲𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗱 & 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗝𝗼𝗶𝗻 𝗦𝘄𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗻 & 𝗗𝗲𝗻𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸 & 𝗣𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮 𝗩𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗗𝘂𝗲 𝗧𝗼 𝗛𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗥𝗶𝘀𝗸𝘀
𝗦𝗹𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗮 𝘀𝘂𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝗝𝗼𝗵𝗻𝘀𝗼𝗻 & 𝗝𝗼𝗵𝗻𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝘃𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵 𝗼𝗳 𝟮𝟬-𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿-𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝘄𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗻 https://insiderpaper.com/slovenia-suspends-johnson-johnson-vaccine-after-womans-death/
In the latest Vaccine Surveillance report from Public Health England (PHE) the infection rate in double-vaccinated people in their 40s went above 100% higher than in the unvaccinated for the first time, reaching 109%. This translates to an unadjusted vaccine effectiveness of minus-109%. https://dailysceptic.org/2021/10/15/infection-rate-in-vaccinated-people-in-their-40s-now-more-than-double-the-rate-in-unvaccinated-phe-data-shows-as-vaccine-effectiveness-hits-minus-109/
IT'S NOT EFFECTIVE: UK data shows that adults 30 years of age and over, that are "fully vaccinated" are substantially MORE LIKELY to have Covid than those that haven’t been injected. The data also shows that someone aged in their 40’s that has a vaccine passport in the UK is 86% MORE LIKELY to have Covid than someone that hasn’t been injected at all.
And what, if any, is this correlation between boosters and fatalities in Israel?
According to a study done by Harvard (at the commission of our own government), less than 1% of all adverse reactions to vaccines are actually submitted to the National Vaccine Adverse Events Reports System (VAERS) - read page 6 at the link above.
Children incur a higher risk of injuries and death from the vaccines than from covid. For brevity, I’ll stick with the easiest example of a flashing-red-light-safety-signal among children, myocarditis—i.e. swelling of the heart that produces permanent heart damage and sometimes death. That’s not something healthy adolescence randomly experience. Yet it is happening at shockingly-high numbers of kids given these jabs, especially boys (age 12-17) who are four to six times more likely to be hospitalized for myocarditis than covid. Check out the expected vs. observed (in red) incidence of myocarditis after the covid injections.
Look closer and you’ll note this data collection stops at the end of Day 6! Who knows how many injuries go unreported because they showed up outside one week? (https://www.deconstructingconventional.com/post/17-more-reasons-i-won-t-be-getting-a-covid-vaccine)
The only industry in the world that bears no liability for injuries or deaths resulting from their products, are vaccine makers. First established in 1986 with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and reinforced by the PREP Act, vaccine makers cannot be sued, even if they are shown to be negligent. The covid-vaccine makers are allowed to create a one-size-fits-all product, with no testing on sub-populations (i.e. people with specific health conditions), and yet they are unwilling to accept any responsibility for any adverse events or deaths their products cause. If a company is not willing to stand behind their product as safe, especially one they rushed to market and skipped animal trials on, I am not willing to take a chance on their product. (18 Reasons I Won't Be Getting a Covid Vaccine - by Christian Elliot)
SUCCESSFUL ALTERNATIVE TREATMENTS EXIST
Several treatment protocols have been known and used to treat many thousands of Covid-19 patients successfully primarily using Ivermectin, Hydroxychoroquin and Zinc. The Indian State of Andra Pradesh is region by region declaring Covid Free status following an Ivermectin based protocol given to it's 240 Million plus population.https://www.indiatoday.in/coronavirus-outbreak/story/uttar-pradesh-districts-covid-free-active-caseload-positivity-rate-1849543-2021-09-06
Ivermectin is now scientifically recognized as an effective drug, in the prophylaxis and treatment of Covid-19 by researchers at the Pasteur Institute in France. The results of their studies were published in the journal EMBO Molecular Medicine on July 12, 2021. Analysis of the results of other research published in the American Journal of Therapeutics strongly urges, with supporting evidence, to bridge the guidelines of health agencies and include Ivermectin as a standard of care.
"Fact Checkers” are deeply corrupt arms of the propaganda machine, a “Ministry of Truth” if you like. Can You Really Trust Vaccine Fact Checkers?
The globalists, big pharma, and the government funded research to support them (like the NIH/EcoHealth/Wuhan bioweapon research - see below).
There have been many attempts to make viral vaccines in the past that ended in utter failure, which is why we did not have a coronavirus vaccine in 2020. In the 1960's, scientists attempted to make an RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) vaccine for infants. In that study, they skipped animal trials because they weren't necessary back then. In the end, the vaccinated infants got much sicker than the unvaccinated infants when exposed to the virus in nature, with 80% of the vaccinated infants requiring hospitalization, and two of them died. After 2000, scientists made many attempts to create coronavirus vaccines. For the past 20 years, all ended in failure because the animals in the clinical trials got very sick and many died, just like the children in the 1960's. (18 Reasons I Won't Be Getting a Covid Vaccine - by Christian Elliot)
Personal communication with Prof. Harald Walach about the removal of his paper Walach, H., Klement, R. J., Aukema, W. (2021). The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations – We Should Rethink the Policy. Vaccines, 9, 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9070693 on politically motivated grounds raised some red flags for me. Since then, we find this has not been an isolated example of research paper censorship.
Rounding the Earth @EduEngineerThe Rose/McCullough paper that calculates estimates of myocarditis due to vaccination does not seem to be available on Elsevir servers. Hmmmm. https://t.co/e7R71Pnq3N
Independent Review of the Efficacy and Safety of the COVID-19 Vaccination to Evaluate Whether “Reasonable Grounds” Have been Established to Enforce Manddatory Vaccination. http://perfekt.media/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/COVID-research-paper-Final.pdf
A protection racket indeed! And this might just be part of a complex web of relationships…
FAUCI AND SIX OTHERS AT NIAID OWN PATENTS IN THE MODERNA VACCINE
Thanks to the Bayh-Dole Act, government workers are allowed to file patents on any research they do using tax payer funding. Tony Fauci owns over 1,000 patents (see this video for more details), including patents being used on the Moderna vaccine...which he approved government funding for. In fact, the NIH (which NIAID is part of) claims joint ownership of Moderna's vaccine. Does anyone else see this as a MAJOR conflict of interest, or criminal even? I say criminal because there's also this pesky problem that makes me even more distrustful of Fauci, NIAD, and the NIH in general. (18 Reasons I Won't Be Getting a Covid Vaccine - by Christian Elliot)
Vaccines have degraded our health over decades - listen to populating health expert Dr Judy Wilyman - https://rumble.com/vnzaz6-covid-truth-with-dr-judy-wilyman-must-watch.html
Nico who writes Tales of New Normaland observes - “Something that seriously bothers me about what's happening is the expectation that every person take the injection for the "good of the collective" (because, as you know very well, "it's not about you, but about others"). This is especially disturbing when looking at companies like Pfizer, who have been acting in ways that would make the Sicilian Mafia proud in terms of the contracts they have been making with nation-states around the world (just to cite an example).
You see, we (the people) are selfish for refusing the injection, but the companies that make the injections are not seen as selfish when they go around behaving like the predatory multinationals that they are. And if they ARE acknowledged to be selfish and profit-oriented, it is simply dismissed, or shrugged away. Because, you know, there's a pAnDemiC. It is a very sad and twisted situation.
Why do the protected need to be protected from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the protection that didn’t protect the protected in the first place? …
Why life jackets should NOT be mandatory (and assorted other insanities many are taking seriously these days)…