10 Comments

Shocking. Just plain shocking. When is your next election? Or will he say not elections untaill everyone vaxxed?

Expand full comment

Elections are irrelevant since these policies are bipartisan. In fact, the Labor Party is more draconian than the Liberal Party. Compare Victoria and Queensland to New South Wuhan.

Expand full comment
author

Yes, turning to Labor would be going from the frypan into the fire!

Expand full comment
author

Federal elections should be early in the new year. There's some hope that the United Australia Party and others will make a dint in the current two party system we have. Some more cynical, Barry that's probably you, don't see elections as the answer and they may well be right. We are in new territory - I simply don't know what's going to happen.

Expand full comment

Comrade Smith,

Did you know there were recent elections in Chanada, Germany, The Netherlands, elsewhere, did anything change re rowuhan policies?

Did you see a Bill by One Nation to outlaw discrimination based on vax status? Only seven senators voted for it!

Expand full comment
author

Yes I'm aware and in regards to the One Nation bill, the senate vote was a disgrace - what is wrong with these people? It's disheartening to say the least.

Expand full comment

Have you thought of the below?

I wonder if they compromised the immunity of a majority of the Earth's population for something else to come?! Bill G had mentioned it - and others have now picked up on it. You mentioned it recently. It is real deadly re smallpox. What if they were to do the unimaginable and release it, like Bill G hinted? Even Warren Buffett said the next pandemic will be worse.

It seems like that they have a schedule to meet, so they are pushing the world to get the vaxes at the same time.

Expand full comment
author

Interesting theory and at this point in time I wouldn't put anything past them!

Expand full comment

We do love freedom. It is just not for everyone.....

Expand full comment

Ooohh!! God forbid someone is called an anti-vaxxer! Oh the horror! (In all seriousness, they are changing these definitions on purpose to try to shame people into supporting their totalitarianism. Sickening.)

Expand full comment