23 Comments

"Unlike traditional Hebrew and Christian beliefs, Gnostics do not believe in redemption so much as enlightenment through divine wisdom. God also exists as an unknowable absolute, whilst a demiurgic ‘lower god’ exists who became known as the ‘God of the Old Testament’. That is, Gnostic tradition holds that the acts of God in the Old Testament - such as the creation of the material universe and the setting apart of Israel - were in fact the acts of a demiurge seeking to keep humanity trapped within a prison reality."

Looks pretty spot on to me. An objective reading of the Old Testament shows Yahweh is a bloodthirsty, gaslighting tyrant with just enough blessings and mercy to keep the captives beholden. I think the original Gnostics were pretty much spot on in their worldview - our world is founded in deception, and the only way out seems to be its complete rejection - which is probably why they were wiped out by the early church, who then stole much of their writings for the New Testament, including Revelations: the greatest act of plagiarism in history.

If you think Gnosticism is the enemy and organised religion is here to save us... well, good luck with that!

Expand full comment

Immanuel Kant was anti enlightenment? Huh.

Expand full comment

An interesting read O'Brien, thanks for keeping it short-ish 😁

Expand full comment

All I can say is where were the hard headed women to teach these boys some lessons? Hard headed men help too. Talk about anti-evolutionary. The roots of the Culture Of Death. We do still have a choice but it is fading fast as the fog of ignorance, war, and genocide get thicker.

Expand full comment

Thanks for a great summary. Gnosticism has been called 'Mystery Babylon - the River of Iniquity'. It seems to be the natural tendency of thinking man - both good and bad, (trapped in this world's Matrix of Self-ishness) - to gravitate towards it. It incorporates all the aspects of fertility cults as well - hence the Gaia Hypothesis and the Green agenda.

Expand full comment

That is a very interesting observation. I (tried) to read Marx in high school and by my reading it was clearly a spiritual, enlightenment path. The economic aspect was entirely circumstantial in that the slog and drudgery of labor prevented man from having the time to spend on the pursuit of esoteric enlightenment. It was quite obvious at its heart and equally obvious that it was a futile endeavor.

Expand full comment

Funny, I've been studying Gnosticism for 20 years and can't find any woke in it, at all. The one I'm most fond of is Valentinian Gnosticism: http://gnosis.org/library/valentinus/Brief_Summary_Theology.htm

Here's a list of other Gnostic sects, maybe there's some woke in there, but I doubt it https://infogalactic.com/info/List_of_Gnostic_sects

What is this hard-on people have with Gnosticism? Does it barbecue their sacred cows? Is their faith so fragile it can't stand the examination and discussion of texts that the warmongering "Holy" Roman Emperor Constantine deemed unfit to include in Christian canon?

Somebody somewhere would spit them from his mouth for being lukewarm...

Expand full comment

It appears that someone can read and regurgitate other people's propaganda & criticism quite well, but does not really seem to 'get it'. They should go talk to Douglas Gabriel and/or John Lash about Gnosticism...

Expand full comment

Marxism is primarily economic... They make valid claims about the issues brought up during the industrial revolution. In fact, they predicted the current state of the world, where corporations and the government work hand in hand.

Focusing on the cultural stuff is like me focusing that most conservatives are religious, without looking at their reasoning why they think free markets work.

Expand full comment

As usual mostly crapp, especially the last two paragraphs. which summarize the ideological prison ,or more correctly dark lightless psychosis that "Winston" is trapped in.

There is Only Light.

Light is all there IS.

All that IS is Light.

Light Is Inherently Indivisible, Non-Separate, and One Only.

Modern quantum science tells us that everything is light, that all of reality - every body both human and non-human, every object, every iota of space and time - is nothing but waves in an ocean of light. But what science does not tell us is that this light is not merely an impersonal force or a mass of energy. It is Conscious; it is Alive - in fact it is a Great Persn of Light, a Radiant Being of Infinite Brightness. Even better put, in Reality, Light IS the Divine Person, the Great One, Living as everything, Appearing as everything, and yet, paradoxically, Always and Only Conscious Light.

The most intimate presumption, the real presumption - that all of this is Light - should be sufficient to make your hair stand on end. Real Communion with Light, or True Spirit Baptism - founded on critical self-understanding - produces ecstasy, profound transformation of your entire body-mind-complex, liberates you from all of your fear-saturated separative psychology.

Light means something holy, something Divine. The notion and the sense of the Holiness or the Profundity of Light - and especially the Divine characteristic of Light, the Ultimacy of Light - is a universal feeling-idea. It is an integral part at the root of all religions, and even secular life as well. Light is fundamental in human experience and aspiration and meaning, indeed it is our True or Eternal Identity before we "fall" into the embodiment trap.

Mindless embodiment.

Consciousness without inwardness.

Thus it becomes obvious.

Every object is only Light, the Energy of Consciousness

Even so, there is no mind.

Only this stark embodiment, without inwardness.

First transcend the mind, not the body.

Inwardness is flight from Life and Love.

Only the body id Full of Consciousness.

Therefore, be the body-only, feeling into Life.

Surrender the mind into Love, until the body dissolves in Light.

Dare this Ecstasy, and never be made thoughtful by birth and experience and death

Expand full comment

I realize I wasn't the only one who read 1984 and noticed that it was talking about Gnosticism...

Expand full comment