26 Comments

The Daily Wire has never been about free speech, and most definitely not about being unprejudiced. I stopped following Jordan Peterson when he was recruited in that jewish shill operation, and my decision was confirmed and sealed when he interviewed Netanyahu. Their narrative does not come apart. It has never been stronger.

No other people on this globe have appropriated a special term for disaproval against them, but the jews. In this day and age we see the true nature of the modern jewish people come to light. They have no qualms starving and shooting civilians when it suits their agenda. Why Shapiro himself advocates similar tactics in another sovereign state, the Lebanon.

Getting fired from the Daily Wire might be the best thing that happened in Candace Owens' carreer.

Expand full comment
Mar 25·edited Mar 25Liked by Winston Smith

What exactly is meant by "This feels remarkably like 2020, when many, otherwise unaware, people begin to wake up to some deeper truth". The George Floyd sanctification 'mostly peaceful ' rioting plus opportunistic looting, raping and murdering.... plus Western MSM performative knee-taking....all that seems to me like the time when 'The Narrative ' got it's biggest boost in 50 years! Depends which 'narrative' you had in mind of course.

Expand full comment

Israel can pretty much take care of itself, militarily, in fact, it's an arms manufacturer and makes everything from Uzis to nukes - of which it has a bunch, enough to blow most of the countries nearby off the map, and still have spares left. It really doesn't need any US aid. And they have the right to defend themselves and their land. October 7th was the seventh time Hamas pulled that kind of stunt, this time they shot a lot more missiles and killed a lot of people. The first time was in 2006, and then every three years thereafter. Hamas would fire missiles and wreck houses and kill people, Israel would shoot back, Hamas would run to the UN and eventually get the Israelis to cease fire, at which point UNRWA would go and supply millions of dollars to re-arm and re-supply Hamas. Never in the 18 years since 2005 did Hamas make a move to establish its own water plant or electrical generation or sewage treatment or anything like that, it all went to weaponry to shoot at the Jews. Personally, I would have done what Israel is doing now, back in 2006. There's no reason for any country to put up with that crap, if the Mexican cartels had fired 30 rockets at El Paso, 30 rockets at San Antonio, and 40 rockets at San Diego, the cartels would have been bombed into the ground and the survivors hunted down with dogs - the Israeli response is entirely legit, and within their rights, and duty to protect their citizens from harm. I don't listen to The Wire or mainstream media, could give a shit about the "narrative", and I'm not Jewish, either.

Expand full comment
author
Mar 25·edited Mar 25Author

Wow, I'd not watched the interview with Owens and Rabbi Barclay until now after posting O'Brien's latest. Well worth watching (as long as it is). My respect for Barclay's position continued to erode the more he talked.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ9GQ-gexhQ

Expand full comment

Good analysis once again, Winston. Linking today @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/

Expand full comment

And I had heard that the show she did about Mr. and Mr. Macron was what sealed her fate, or helped to do so. In that show, she highlighted a 3-year investigation that "proved" that the lady Macron was, in fact, also a Mr. Macron and that TPTB "installed" the Macrons in France so they could be thoroughly controlled, given that TPTB were holding the truth over their heads. If there is a hot-button issue sensitive to those behind the curtain, sure to get you fired, this might well be one.

Oddly enough, I learned about Owens's broadcast on this topic from another Substack account, that has disappeared. Not only has that account disappeared, it happened to disappear pretty much as I was watching and commenting on Owens's broadcast. That abrupt disappearance, coming just before Owens was fired, let me to believe it was that particular broadcast that may have been the 3d rail that must mot be touched at the risk of one's career., or worse. Perhaps it's just coincidence, but after what we've been experiencing since the end of WWII, I no longer believe in coincidences.

Expand full comment

Just looking at him, one can see he's an exemplary being, celebrating the anniversary of the totally justified murder of tens of thousands. Everyone should take guidance from such a man, no?

Expand full comment

Thank you Winston!

So informative and illuminating and I always learn so much and written in your usual straightforward and easy to follow way. I treasure your mind and your ability to convey yourself so simply and so brilliantly at the same time! Never stop writing!!!

Expand full comment

"More people are waking up to the full scale of the attack on the west, and so long as they stay locked in on the truth, they will avoid deceptions, and may yet save western civilisation."

A new notion about what "saving western civilisation" might look like came into my head when I read that line.

If we are completely honest with ourselves, we are up against pretty steep odds:

1) Massive numbers of vaxxed people could start succumbing to the poison over the next couple of years, resulting in incapacitating injuries and/or death. And correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like the highest vax rates are generally in the wealthiest countries, such as those in the West;

2) Huge numbers of (I suspect largely unvaccinated) Third Worlders are simultaneously flooding into Western countries.

This phenomenon is often called The Great Replacement, and it could end very badly and very violently. Or not. Or... maybe we will see lots of violence followed by a calmer, better world. Here's how this could play out:

We could see a huge die-off in the next couple of years, and there could be lots of chaos and confusion. In this case, the Powers that put us on this course will try to steer the civilisational ship their way, but I suspect they are losing their grip on the game. They are too arrogant to even realize they are losing it; they could just start flipping out more and more. "Pride goeth before a fall."

For those of us who survive the tumult, here's what could come next:

Our Nations as we know them will fall apart. That will be extremely difficult at first, but ultimately it will mean that we get rid of our corrupt governments, who do nothing except tax us on everything (our labour, carbon, rain water... you name it, they tax it) and then "re-distribute" the wealth. This wealth re-distribution is not so much about helping out the "proletariat" as using the *idea* of a "proletariat" (whoever that happens to be at a given time, they keep changing the characters) to screw all of us and ultimately re-direct wealth and power to themselves. (Doesn't matter if you're living in a "communist" system or a "capitalist" system anymore - it's just the same shit, meted out by the same masters.)

But once the governments are out of the way, we can start to pick up the pieces.

What I think could happen next is that the surviving people of European descent - white westerners - will start re-building a new civilisation. Other people of other races who are capable will do the same. But European-descended people will also fan out, and start living in other areas outside our traditional homelands (to the extent that long-distance travel is possible).

Small communities will get built up in various places that are still habitable by races that are "civilisation builders," particularly by the people who are now defined as Westerners. Peoples who are not as capable of building civilisations will take up residence around those communities, and they will appreciate what living in proximity to more technologically capable people can offer them.

Incidentally, this isn't so different to what used to happen in parts of Canada as it was settled by Europeans - every time white people set up a trading post or any kind of encampment, native peoples would settle around it because doing so afforded them survival advantages (access to more stable food, useful tools like metal cooking pots and guns, woven cloth clothes). It was often the actions of governments and their institutions that led to the historical conflicts we now view as "problematic." (You gotta love it - the governments cause the problems, and then they shift the blame onto We The People.)

I realize this might sound ridiculously utopian, and I could even be accused of being a White Supremacist. But I'm neither a utopian nor a supremacist - I'm just trying to envision a scenario that could work out best for those of us - all of us - who are able to survive the coming calamity.

Expand full comment